before that, Democrats over-performed by 2.9 points

this means that in reality,

Democrats could be leading by 9-10 points in the generic ballot and still not take the house,

because they need to win 7-8 points in the popular vote to flip the house,

so when adjusted with that 2.9-3.6 margin of error, being as high as 10 could not mean much, but being higher than 10 could be troubling

It's really not just keeping the house, which is important nonetheless, but winning it with at least 230 seats

We don't want it to be too close

so, to get it straight

2014: Republicans overperofrming by 3.3
2010: Republicans underperforming by 2.6
2006: Democrats underperforming by 3.6
2002: Democrats overpeforming by 2.9

?

correct

keep in mind that in 2002, the GOP actually made gains

although I wouldn't be surprised if polling methodology has changed since then

by the way, what's more important than speculating over polls is taking action

wait

come to think of it, you can speculate over polls all you want, but will that actually change anything?

okay so,

2002: Republicans outperform polls (+2.9)
2006: Democrats underperform polls (-3.6)
2010: Republicans underperform polls (-2.6)
2014: Republicans outperform polls (+3.3)

as long as Democrats aren't leading by 9.4 through 10.4, we should be fine

make no mistake,

the margin of error can swing either way

so even if Democrats are leading only by +3.2, they have a shot

although with 3.2, it's extremely unlikely they can come close to prevailing,

however,

this is the most important factor of all,

**if** by election day,

**if**,

Democrats are leading by 10.5 points,

they **will** flip the house

**100%** chance Democrats flip the house if they are leading the ballot by +10.5

has anyone else here decided to make a fake FB account to see what the masses are discussing when it comes to the midterms?

I've noticed that all the Trump supporter pages are just boomer-tier memes

nothing on the midterms

@Den did you also notice that?

https://i.redditmedia.com/YsavbXhfIiZII3mq9Q3StoN4lFKbuBXze8gzGnJQU7Q.jpg?fit=crop&crop=faces%2Centropy&arh=2&w=640&fm=jpg&s=2e477f3fd7cbfc1efc6e8802a136d054

Ron Paul endorses Nick Freitas for the Virginia Senate Seat

hmm

Lemme look this up

"As a sovereign nation, we have an obligation to secure our borders. Our immigration system must be reformed to allow for safe and sensible legal immigration. We cannot allow for processes that do not take into account the best interests of our citizens. The current system has allowed terrorists and criminals to step in front of honest immigrants seeking to assimilate into our society. Nick supports both strengthening our border security and adopting merit-based immigration policies."

Sounds like a good guy to me, he seems like my kind of libertarian.