Message from @Gigglemesh
Discord ID: 432654697783099394
How would you guys handle North Korea if you were Blumpf
''(a) a person born in the United States before 1982 or conceived either by an American mother or by an American father who has been a resident of the United States.''
It's an extension of the trade war with China; however, the fact is that we would profit immensely in the polls if Korea unified.
14th amendment is what establishes jus soli though isn't it?
Not quite.
I think we'd need a constitutional amendment for that, right?
I'd handle NK the same way Trump is, also
The US Code (Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965) establishes it, and the Supreme Court has left the question of whether it can be abolished ambiguous.
Madman Theory
In its original context, Congress guaranteed birthright citizenship regardless of race in the Immigration Act of 1865 or something
14th amendment
and then the SCOTUS ruled on that
however Congress has the power to act to enforce the 14th amendment
huh
This is really something that's more like "It's been around for so long it feels like a part of the Constitution." but it's really Act of Congress
Just got a 12hr timeout on twittwe for calling everyone bloodthirsty scumbags who was in favor of intervention in Syria. This literally just happened in Libya, when you depose a secular strongman in that region, you leave the country vunerable to fundamentalist radicals. Fucking morons, i got a huge bug up my ass over this one.
I don't remember which law they tried to use to bar citizenship to the Chinese man in the original context in the 19th century
but I'm pretty sure it was something about Chinese exclusion basically
From where?
@Gigglemesh Twitter has been the Stasi for a while now
Chinese Exclusion Act was an example of competent Congress
IMO Twitter is worse than Facebook
Yeah, democracy can't work in the ME and Africa
"The Constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words, either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except insofar as this is done by the affirmative declaration that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." In this as in other respects, it must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162; Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417, 422; Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 624, 625; Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465. The language of the Constitution, as has been well said, could not be understood without reference to the common law. Kent Com. 336; Bradley, J., in Moore v. United States, 91 U.S. 270, 274. [p655]"
Also 1924 Immigration Act
^
however it continues with stuff like the original Immigration Act which excluded whites
Thanks for explaining the specifics of jus soli btw
and it goes on with how blacks have citizenship
actually, here's another question you guys can consider
If you found yourself mind controlling Trump right now, what would you do?
(in this scenario, we're starting from right now, not January 20, 2017)
and eventually it basically declares that Chinese (Asians) are also citizens by this logic
National Origins Quota is vital
However it leaves the door open to excluding people
Well, I'd fire every globalist in the admin
Anyway, can we think of strategies to get 2nd/3rd generation Mexican immigrants to vote red?
In fact the Constitution does this _outright_
They wont
Start the America First Contract
Congress has just voided the "Indians untaxed" exception by granting citizenship to and taxing all natives.