Message from @Gigglemesh

Discord ID: 432654553184337930


2018-04-08 21:29:20 UTC  

Yep, he should've at least gotten some Congressional allies to start proposing constitutional amendments as he promised he would do.

2018-04-08 21:29:23 UTC  

Every district and senate seat

2018-04-08 21:29:52 UTC  

And yeah, I'd amend the constitution to get rid of birthright citizenship and presidential term limits.

2018-04-08 21:30:18 UTC  

I'd want to be in office for as long as needed to fix this place.

2018-04-08 21:30:40 UTC  

We can just amend the birthright citizenship portion of the US Code.

2018-04-08 21:30:54 UTC  

How would you guys handle North Korea if you were Blumpf

2018-04-08 21:31:09 UTC  

''(a) a person born in the United States before 1982 or conceived either by an American mother or by an American father who has been a resident of the United States.''

2018-04-08 21:31:29 UTC  

It's an extension of the trade war with China; however, the fact is that we would profit immensely in the polls if Korea unified.

2018-04-08 21:32:11 UTC  

14th amendment is what establishes jus soli though isn't it?

2018-04-08 21:32:19 UTC  

Not quite.

2018-04-08 21:32:27 UTC  

I think we'd need a constitutional amendment for that, right?

2018-04-08 21:32:59 UTC  

I'd handle NK the same way Trump is, also

2018-04-08 21:32:59 UTC  

The US Code (Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965) establishes it, and the Supreme Court has left the question of whether it can be abolished ambiguous.

2018-04-08 21:33:05 UTC  

Madman Theory

2018-04-08 21:33:25 UTC  

In its original context, Congress guaranteed birthright citizenship regardless of race in the Immigration Act of 1865 or something

2018-04-08 21:33:36 UTC  

14th amendment

2018-04-08 21:33:39 UTC  

and then the SCOTUS ruled on that

2018-04-08 21:33:53 UTC  

however Congress has the power to act to enforce the 14th amendment

2018-04-08 21:34:23 UTC  

huh

2018-04-08 21:34:31 UTC  

This is really something that's more like "It's been around for so long it feels like a part of the Constitution." but it's really Act of Congress

2018-04-08 21:34:43 UTC  

Just got a 12hr timeout on twittwe for calling everyone bloodthirsty scumbags who was in favor of intervention in Syria. This literally just happened in Libya, when you depose a secular strongman in that region, you leave the country vunerable to fundamentalist radicals. Fucking morons, i got a huge bug up my ass over this one.

2018-04-08 21:34:53 UTC  

I don't remember which law they tried to use to bar citizenship to the Chinese man in the original context in the 19th century

2018-04-08 21:35:01 UTC  

but I'm pretty sure it was something about Chinese exclusion basically

2018-04-08 21:35:07 UTC  

From where?

2018-04-08 21:35:14 UTC  
2018-04-08 21:35:18 UTC  

twitter

2018-04-08 21:35:30 UTC  

@Gigglemesh Twitter has been the Stasi for a while now

2018-04-08 21:35:36 UTC  

Chinese Exclusion Act was an example of competent Congress

2018-04-08 21:35:39 UTC  

IMO Twitter is worse than Facebook

2018-04-08 21:35:40 UTC  

Yeah, democracy can't work in the ME and Africa

2018-04-08 21:35:42 UTC  

"The Constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words, either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except insofar as this is done by the affirmative declaration that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." In this as in other respects, it must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162; Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417, 422; Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 624, 625; Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465. The language of the Constitution, as has been well said, could not be understood without reference to the common law. Kent Com. 336; Bradley, J., in Moore v. United States, 91 U.S. 270, 274. [p655]"

2018-04-08 21:35:50 UTC  

Also 1924 Immigration Act

2018-04-08 21:35:54 UTC  

^

2018-04-08 21:36:02 UTC  

however it continues with stuff like the original Immigration Act which excluded whites

2018-04-08 21:36:05 UTC  

Thanks for explaining the specifics of jus soli btw

2018-04-08 21:36:09 UTC  

and it goes on with how blacks have citizenship

2018-04-08 21:36:20 UTC  

actually, here's another question you guys can consider

If you found yourself mind controlling Trump right now, what would you do?

(in this scenario, we're starting from right now, not January 20, 2017)

2018-04-08 21:36:21 UTC  

and eventually it basically declares that Chinese (Asians) are also citizens by this logic

2018-04-08 21:36:22 UTC  

National Origins Quota is vital

2018-04-08 21:36:33 UTC  

However it leaves the door open to excluding people

2018-04-08 21:36:36 UTC  

Well, I'd fire every globalist in the admin