Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃

Discord ID: 432945751895834634


2018-04-09 16:44:26 UTC  

Yes, but I mean sort of in the economic left wing sense.

2018-04-09 16:44:31 UTC  

hmm

2018-04-09 16:44:46 UTC  

what kinds of socialistic policies do you have in mind

2018-04-09 16:45:03 UTC  

Higher wages for one, I could incorporate that i to immigration

2018-04-09 16:45:10 UTC  

manufacturing subsidies and tariffs

2018-04-09 16:45:15 UTC  

A lot of people call tariffs socialist

2018-04-09 16:45:28 UTC  

Yeah, subsidies, that's another one

2018-04-09 16:45:54 UTC  

Instead of *getting rid* of entitlements, *reforming* entitlements could grab us more of the white vote

2018-04-09 16:46:16 UTC  

it would help if Republicans became more environment and private union friendly

2018-04-09 16:47:04 UTC  

Definitely, especially as the era of right to work heightens with this upcoming supreme court case

2018-04-09 16:47:29 UTC  

The environment will be tough though

2018-04-09 16:47:56 UTC  

We could get the EPA to crack down on xenoestrogens

2018-04-09 16:48:23 UTC  

A big issue is the left uses "the environment" as an excuse to push cultural and social marxism.

2018-04-09 16:48:47 UTC  

"Having kids are bad for the environment, gender inequality is bad for the environment"

2018-04-09 16:49:36 UTC  

If we want to win on that message, we have to have practical solutions to keeping the environment safer, but we also have to get coal miners and the such on our side, which these solutions hurt immensely.

2018-04-09 16:49:37 UTC  

We could use it to our advantage

2018-04-09 16:49:47 UTC  

as an excuse to reduce immigration levels to virtually nothing

2018-04-09 16:50:11 UTC  

If we were to develop hydrogen fuel cells for energy generation, it would destroy coal mining.

2018-04-09 16:50:33 UTC  

We'd solve the environmental issues, but also devastate a large portion of the base. How do we reconcile this?

2018-04-09 16:51:26 UTC  

yeah, that's a problem

2018-04-09 16:51:50 UTC  

one solution would be to virtually eliminate all taxes to maximize job growth

2018-04-09 16:52:18 UTC  

You mean fund the government on tariffs and excise taxes like the 1800s?

2018-04-09 16:52:22 UTC  

right

2018-04-09 16:52:30 UTC  

Maybe.

2018-04-09 16:52:41 UTC  

We'd have to be real heavy on tariffs though.

2018-04-09 16:54:09 UTC  

I would definitely be for extreme excise taxes on something like marijuana, I'm talking 3 figures of percentages. It still wouldn't be enough to fund the government.

2018-04-09 16:55:14 UTC  

We'd also have to lower spending, which we could dip into for the military and eliminate stuff like the ATF, TSA, Department of Energy, and ofher garbage bureaucracies.

2018-04-09 16:55:21 UTC  

i'm telling you,

2018-04-09 16:55:27 UTC  

go for a remittance tax

2018-04-09 16:55:33 UTC  

The issue is entitlements, we'd have to really make those extremely efficient.

2018-04-09 16:55:49 UTC  

Remittance taxes would be fine until we deport everyone who uses them

2018-04-09 16:56:09 UTC  

yeah, it would best as a quick source of cash,

2018-04-09 16:56:33 UTC  

Yea, at least a 30% tax on any money transferred outside of country

2018-04-09 16:56:35 UTC  

Imho

2018-04-09 16:56:37 UTC  

Orre

2018-04-09 16:56:41 UTC  

obviously we should put work requirements for entitlements

2018-04-09 16:56:48 UTC  

A small 2% tax to avoid a black market

2018-04-09 16:56:53 UTC  

Either way it needs to be taxed

2018-04-09 16:56:54 UTC  

Although, with the economic effect of ethnicities, hispanics and blacks tend to take away from the economy and europeans add to the economy, so the entitlement effects could be eased there with a repatriation program.

2018-04-09 16:57:33 UTC  

Also, work requirements as long as you don't have a debilitating disability or were a veteran.

2018-04-09 16:57:56 UTC  

We're going to make it, aren't we?