https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CicaX0oe-QM&feature=push-u-sub&attr_tag=LPutfITS__fov4Gm-6

<@&399683356218097667> <@&432627153805377536> WATCH THIS

RICK SCOTT IS RUNNING FOR SENATE

SAY IT WITH ME

RED FLORIDA

<:red:432915336648720404>

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/982353242196766720
STOP PANDERING DONALD

BASED 8% of 13% of the Population!

But this helps with the white vote

Doesn't it?

because of stupid white people who love virtue signalling

They'll never be convinced by this

The way I would go toward more left wing whites would be by advocating for higher wages and the such

How about for ONCE, appealing to your base

Conservative Labor, America First.

Something like that.

If Trump could win over 3 to 4 points of the White Vote, he'd be lock on for 2020

And yes, Trump's base does entail traditionally democratic white voters alongside traditionally conservative voters.

Whites must be the absolute bread and butter for the GOP here on out.

I'd advocate for some socialistic positions alongside conservative positions, it's all got to be for the good of the country. We could last forever if we have whites vote as a bloc like hispanics.

@FLanon IMO the way to win over left wing whites is to make them right wing first

Yes, but I mean sort of in the economic left wing sense.

hmm

what kinds of socialistic policies do you have in mind

Higher wages for one, I could incorporate that i to immigration

manufacturing subsidies and tariffs

A lot of people call tariffs socialist

Yeah, subsidies, that's another one

Instead of *getting rid* of entitlements, *reforming* entitlements could grab us more of the white vote

it would help if Republicans became more environment and private union friendly

Definitely, especially as the era of right to work heightens with this upcoming supreme court case

The environment will be tough though

We could get the EPA to crack down on xenoestrogens

A big issue is the left uses "the environment" as an excuse to push cultural and social marxism.

"Having kids are bad for the environment, gender inequality is bad for the environment"

If we want to win on that message, we have to have practical solutions to keeping the environment safer, but we also have to get coal miners and the such on our side, which these solutions hurt immensely.

We could use it to our advantage

as an excuse to reduce immigration levels to virtually nothing

If we were to develop hydrogen fuel cells for energy generation, it would destroy coal mining.

We'd solve the environmental issues, but also devastate a large portion of the base. How do we reconcile this?

yeah, that's a problem

one solution would be to virtually eliminate all taxes to maximize job growth