2 Rs go to the runoff, no chance of a Dem getting elected

because it risks losing the seat all together

if it was 7 Rs then you'd have a point

But it's 2.

even if it was 2

It's a dumb idea.

have the primary pick the person

and there were 3 Rs in this one

and be done with it, unless it is at the utmost urgency that the person put through the primary is a problem.

it's honestly stupider to run 1 R in that district than 2

my point is it sets a bad precedent.

That republicans can just run if they don't win the nomination.

Imgaine if they did this with a Senate or a US House seat.

Or even a state house seat.

dude it's a state legislature

It's a problem that should be condoned

shoudln't*

In this district, we should

Even if a dem got higher in the polling, a runoff would destroy the dem

alright

A runoff generally does very much harm the Democrat in these solid red races. It increases turnout and can drain voters from the Democrat.

I'm just saying like in GA-06

Hi just saying like in GA-06, I'm Dad!

What if Ossoff got 50% of the vote

It's not anything like that

This bot is a rat.

no

Oh my gosh FLanon

It is nothing like that now, but we need to consider the possibility that it can.

There is not a chance in hell, read my words, that a democrat will get over 50% in this district

YES

The is true!

but in OTHER districts it is possible.

What precedent is there to set exactly?

And if Republican candidates see this as a fine behavior.

This is a spot that shows it would vote for 2 Rs over 1R and 1D

nvm, you have your opinion set.

It is absolutely harmless

And aren't listening.

I doubt this will be reviewed as precedent. This is not a high profile race.