So it's a general election.

If no one does, the top 2 candidates get to a runoff election

yes

by technicality

So it's not a primary

Thus my point being.

This across the board, is a bad idea, we shouldn't ram as many candidates into the general election as possible.

it resembles jungle primaries more than it resembles a general election

Why not 2 in this case?

this is the end of Dlimpfovich McPutin

It's not a jungle primary because someone wins a set if they get 50% of the vote

It has resemblance

I don't see why my notion is that far out there.

because of the fact that the history of this seat has had 2 Rs go to a runoff

If someone wins the primary we should get behind them even if we don't like them instead of having faithless candidates who stay on the ballet till the end.

but they haven't

This kind of action gives the democrats an advantage if they're more unified./

that's not how this election works

there's no primary

it's open season until a runoff happens

d!dab

Why can't we just avoid this type of stuff.

Splitting votes is bad period.

Sometimes it's a risk you take when there's not a chance of a democratic pickup?

fair?

It guarantees an R gets the seat in a runoff

d!dab

There is no reason to split your votes if there is a chance it will cost us the seat.

There is not a single chance of democratic pickup in this seat

Not one

I'd bet my tongue on it

I'm not

Hi not, I'm Dad!

Fucking

talking

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 that image is disgusting. lol

About this seat in particular

I said "across the board" and generally"

It sets absolutely 0 precedent