(R win)

@Rhodesiaboo Well also because 2010 was the year of the republican

wait

So, if we manage to make it slim, that's a good indicator

I pinged the wrong person

@FLanon yeah, the thing is, 2014 in PA was a mediocre time for the Republicans

now, they did well in other parts of the country, but it just goes to show what kind of an effect a shitty incumbent will have

If it's 2:1, it's a bad sign

@zakattack04 both 2010 and 2014 were GOP dominated years

2014 I'd say was a good year

that's why it's not all about trends

eh

there can be special cases that defy the norm

We've had better

like PA

Now, remember this.

with an unpopular incumbent

No matter what happens, we fight hard and to our largest capacity.

Races to keep your eyes on in tomorrow’s primary and special elections:

PA Senate GOP primary
PA05 Dem primary (whoever wins probably wins seat)
PA07 Dem primary
PA14 (RICK SACCONE IS BACK)
NE02 turnout

PA178 (special): R+7
PA48 (special): R+15

No you're kidding...

Saccone is back?

Yep!

@zakattack04 Saccone is running for a redder district

NO

Push him to the floor

GO AWAY

the newly redistrictred PA-14 is more safely GOP than the previous PA-18

he shouldn't be in politics after that embarrassment

now, he still shouldn't be running, but it's not as big of a deal as running in a more swing district

+20 R district lmao

Wathc him lose it again.

fucking lazy old deadbeat

So what's the deal with PA-05

PA-05,

Nebraska-02, I'm assuming that's the very small one, right?

near Omaha

Yes

LOL

@FLanon Nebraska-02 went for Obama in 2008

He got moved across the state

Ok PA Supreme Court..