Message from @Nuke
Discord ID: 455212962152579082
went from 216 to 313
4 years later, the total went up to 334
the Republicans only had 88 seats after that
Florida Senate GE:
Rick Scott (R) 48% (+3)
Bill Nelson (D-inc) 45%
Cherry Communications/@FlChamber 5/25-6/4
https://t.co/i59fZUq1i5 #FLsen
My call for US congressional redistricting after the 2020 census based on current population growth rates.
Yellow=losing a district for sure
Purple= possibly losing a district
Green= gaining a district for sure
Blue= Possibly gaining a district.
>California
>no possibility of losing a district
I am not sure honestly.
The population for LA has slowing down.
Purple mate. Also, Louisiana could also gain a district; our population actually grew after Katrina.
The state missed its 40 million in 2016.
Correct. We lost a district but gained in population, just not fast enough to make up for the increased counting of illegals.
Interesting.
Also Popeyes chicken sucks.
It hasn't been good in years.
And Louisiana's population has only grown by 3.3% since 2010.
At the most, you may grow by 5% by 2020.
So uh
The Northeast looks OK because states there have illegals.
But Minnesota, Florida, California, New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona look weird.
I am aware that the census changes.
But states like Illinois has had a negative growth rate since 2010.
Don't worry. They're certain to lose seats because of illegals in the first place.
Ohio's population isn't doing well either.
The county I am in has had a negative growth rate since 2010.
Hah, just looked up another statistic and found a funny tidbit: North Dakota, with 12.5% growth, definitely does not qualify.
It'll stay At-Large.
Most likely
The population hasn't hit 1 million yet.
Montana was considered in 2010 to gain a congressional district, but fell short.
Yeah, Montana has had potential every census since they lost their second district.
Given Rhode Island has two districts with a mere ~500K people each, Montana really deserves one.
Based
Trudeau wears fake eyebrows
Please spread