http://www.270towin.com/2018-house-election/1ld92eK

Moderates could win DE-AL, MA-9, IL-10, and a few MD districts that could be gained via the WI/MD gerrymandering case.

That said, Wisconsin (in a realistic best case scenario) could win its case while Maryland could lose its case, despite the obvious fact that the SCOTUS would prefer to appear bipartisan, based on the fact that Maryland's 2010 redistricting scheme is both visibly worse and also was fairly transparently discussed--allowing the Supreme Court to see that there was motive, which is not so clearly visible in the Wisconsin case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_1932

lol look at this pickup in 1932 when Roosevelt trounced Hoover

D's won 97 seats

went from 216 to 313

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_1936

4 years later, the total went up to 334

the Republicans only had 88 seats after that

Florida Senate GE:
Rick Scott (R) 48% (+3)
Bill Nelson (D-inc) 45%

Cherry Communications/@FlChamber 5/25-6/4
https://t.co/i59fZUq1i5 #FLsen

My call for US congressional redistricting after the 2020 census based on current population growth rates.
Yellow=losing a district for sure
Purple= possibly losing a district
Green= gaining a district for sure
Blue= Possibly gaining a district.

>California

>no possibility of losing a district

I am not sure honestly.

The population for LA has slowing down.

Purple mate. Also, Louisiana could also gain a district; our population actually grew after Katrina.

The state missed its 40 million in 2016.

@Nuke You lost a district after the 2010 census.

Correct. We lost a district but gained in population, just not fast enough to make up for the increased counting of illegals.

Interesting.

Also Popeyes chicken sucks.

It hasn't been good in years.

And Louisiana's population has only grown by 3.3% since 2010.

At the most, you may grow by 5% by 2020.

So uh

Did you factor the census changes?

The Northeast looks OK because states there have illegals.

But Minnesota, Florida, California, New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona look weird.

I am aware that the census changes.

But states like Illinois has had a negative growth rate since 2010.

Don't worry. They're certain to lose seats because of illegals in the first place.

Ohio's population isn't doing well either.

The county I am in has had a negative growth rate since 2010.

Hah, just looked up another statistic and found a funny tidbit: North Dakota, with 12.5% growth, definitely does not qualify.

It'll stay At-Large.

Most likely

The population hasn't hit 1 million yet.

Montana was considered in 2010 to gain a congressional district, but fell short.

Yeah, Montana has had potential every census since they lost their second district.