But that DOESN'T mean she'll lose.

exactly 3,582,721 fewer voters

*fewer, not less

As cliche civnat as it is, I do really like the walk away movement.

well, it boils down to the Rust Belt states that Trump won, and Florida

One less nig voting for welfare is always a positive

The walk away movement is end not unto necessarily creating news Republicans but suppressing turnout among existing Democrats.

if Harris pushes a SJW platform, I think Trump easily wins Florida and wins the rust belt states at even greater margins -> boom

And it seems a lot like its splitting along religious lines

at which point, we don't even need New Hampshire, Minnesota, Nevada, Virginia, etc

Black Christians are leaving the democratic party

Don't forget all the connections Harris has to big donors and the media thanks to her Husband, Schlomo Sheckelstein

Yes again, the rust belts determine the elections so whoever runs has to pander to them

Her sister also literally works for MSNBC too

New Hampshire's electorate is predominated by fickle Karens who are centre-right but vote largely based on character concerns.

Keep in mind also, all of the anti-Trump character attacks on DJT have been critically disempowered due to overuse in the 2016 election cycle.

@[Lex] New Hampshire has a bit of a libertarian streak so I think that a non capitalistic Democrat would lose it

yeah, and Trump will have been more or less normalized by 2020

much of it already got old by November 8, 2016

Democrats will have to truly revolutionise their electoral approach to win a presidential election.

Sanders did win a lot of support in the rust belt because of his isolationist ideas, do any of these other candidates besides sanders have these views?

The Democrats have quite the bag of tricks at their disposal after all.

so by November 3, 2020 it'll be all the more older

The reason why we won the rust belt was because of High White Turnout and Low Minority Turnout/Support

I strongly urge people to support the #walkaway movement however. It's far easier to convince minorities not to vote than to have them vote for Republicans. The fewer the legacy Democrats the better.

What about stuff like how the polls were 20 points off on Sanders during the primary

🆙 | **RDE leveled up!**

In Michigan

@ThatRightWingFish "The reason why we won the rust belt was because of High White Turnout and Low Minority Turnout/Support"

keep in mind that's mainly because of reasons other than race itself. Realize that while race is a thing, you can't simplify the underlying explanations that way

if Hillary Clinton were black, people still would refuse to turn out

^
Why whites voted at high amounts is what's important and how we can replicate that turnout.

That is what I am saying lol

Most Republicans don't give a fuck about deficit spending.

National security, immigration and economy.

I guess that is good news that independents are placing immigration on highest priority, but it doesn't specify whether pro or against

@RDE All evidence I've seen suggest it's strongly against.

Independents are a very white group.