This is who I look up to
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Alan_Coey

Why do you have such a massive interest in Rhodesia?

I look up to this guy.

Anyways, in Isaiah, he predicted that Judah would fall to Babylon in some time, he reassured Hezekiah that it wouldn't be in his lifetime. By the way I got a bit mixed up earlier, it was Ahaz that was wicked, Hezekiah was one of the good ones. Isaiah takes place during both King Ahaz and Hezekiah's reigns.

Blah

Convoluted history

yeah but nonetheless, Isaiah is a pretty badass book

mmm

I realize that Israel shouldn’t exist until the Second coming of Christ, but the Jews ruined it

Well the true Israel is the kingdom of heaven now

The state of Israel is not really a true successor in any way, shape, or form when it comes to actual Christian canon

Well this has been interesting

Goodnight guys

Goodnight.

Well, if A. Jones has been removed P. Little has no hope.

A round of elections taking place tomorrow, folks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjgqb-wG4Ko

i am cute

im cute

Hi cute, I'm Dad!

the dad bot is stupid

I just realized, we can use Alex Jones getting censored into our favor. We can run on saying (with proof) that the left it out to censor political differences.

alex jones got censored?

from what?

He got removed from multiple platforms, that is a clear form of censorship.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packingham_v._North_Carolina

even youtube?

yes

i love his stuff

this is truly a sad day

https://twitter.com/4YrsToday

rip alex jones

I think that should the moment arise, the supreme court could rule for us on the issue of social media censorship for political opinion

I love how this guy has incredibly biased polls and yet some of these still get substantial anti-Democrat dissenting votes.

totes funny

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/9565pq/ted_cruz_am_no_fan_of_jones_among_other_things_he/

https://i.redd.it/mspou0tglje11.png

im confused

Hi confused, I'm Dad!

"Even with these assumptions, the statute here enacts a prohibition
unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech it burdens.
Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate
with one another on any subject that might come to mind.
With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many
are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for
employment, **speaking and listening in the modern public square**,
and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and
knowledge. Foreclosing access to social media altogether thus prevents
users from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment
rights. Even convicted criminals—and in some instances especially
convicted criminals—might receive legitimate benefits from
these means for access to the world of ideas, particularly if they seek
to reform and to pursue lawful and rewarding lives. "
-Packingham v. North Carolina
This case was unanimously decided.

I think that if we got a case like Jared Taylor's brought up to the courts, they would rule in his favor.