true

and it is

im not sure about the "pretty historically accurate" bit though

idk enough about history for that

there are a bit of incomprehensions due to the poor tralsation

yes there are some evidences backed by archaeology

but it isn't majorly qualified to say be a historical source for example

Genesis is poorly translated

the word used for days in the creation doesn't mean day

it can mean era aswell

genesis

isn't the genesis creation story borrowed from the babylonian creation myth

the bible isnt historically accurate at all

and from some other creation stories of that time?

sure they are

most stories of the Bible are taken by nearby cultures

that's why I said "pretty accurate"

yeah

not completely

id say it's hardly accurate tbh

not even pretty

you have to know what to take as a myth and what not to

it isnt historically accurate at all

advance some evidence maybe?

but some loony christians blur the line between myth and fact

^

the Exodus, a few problems with it

first, the egyptians didnt use slave labor

other than the exodus?

partially correct

wait _what_?

Egyptians did use slaves for a slight period

they didnt use slave labor in their construction projects

sorry im not educated at all about ancient civilisation

true

so excuse the ignorance

you have to know that the pyramids for example weren't built by slaves

rather by well paid workers

the entire population of egyptian was a couple million, so 600,000 people leaving would be a bit obvious

i think it was about 1/5 the population

again