the bible could very well have justified slavery too

the modern church has an interpretation of the Bible

that goes against slavery

it does anyways

not really

look back 80 years

again it's an interpretation

yes of course

if you go by its fundamental and literal sense

you could find all sorts of justifications

not really

it's like reading the law codes of ancient hebrews from an history book

yes really

Bible is historically accurate?

well if it's just law codes of ancient hebrew times, then it belongs in the annals of history

the Bible is pretty historically accurate

also correct

it can hardly be justified as religious literature

true indeed

which is applicable in modern times

true

and it is

im not sure about the "pretty historically accurate" bit though

idk enough about history for that

there are a bit of incomprehensions due to the poor tralsation

yes there are some evidences backed by archaeology

but it isn't majorly qualified to say be a historical source for example

Genesis is poorly translated

the word used for days in the creation doesn't mean day

it can mean era aswell

genesis

isn't the genesis creation story borrowed from the babylonian creation myth

the bible isnt historically accurate at all

and from some other creation stories of that time?

sure they are

most stories of the Bible are taken by nearby cultures

that's why I said "pretty accurate"

yeah

not completely

id say it's hardly accurate tbh

not even pretty