Message from @HaloNest
Discord ID: 494888310054060062
also correct
it can hardly be justified as religious literature
true indeed
which is applicable in modern times
true
and it is
im not sure about the "pretty historically accurate" bit though
idk enough about history for that
there are a bit of incomprehensions due to the poor tralsation
yes there are some evidences backed by archaeology
but it isn't majorly qualified to say be a historical source for example
Genesis is poorly translated
the word used for days in the creation doesn't mean day
it can mean era aswell
genesis
isn't the genesis creation story borrowed from the babylonian creation myth
the bible isnt historically accurate at all
and from some other creation stories of that time?
sure they are
most stories of the Bible are taken by nearby cultures
yeah
not completely
id say it's hardly accurate tbh
not even pretty
you have to know what to take as a myth and what not to
it isnt historically accurate at all
advance some evidence maybe?
but some loony christians blur the line between myth and fact
^
the Exodus, a few problems with it
first, the egyptians didnt use slave labor
other than the exodus?
partially correct
wait _what_?
Egyptians did use slaves for a slight period
they didnt use slave labor in their construction projects
sorry im not educated at all about ancient civilisation
true
so excuse the ignorance
you have to know that the pyramids for example weren't built by slaves