Interesting info there

safety remains the main priority, over the fact that still no long term studies have been done. These studies need the following criteria for proper safety testing: latency for at least 10 years, the presence of an inert placebo group (saline as placebo, not aluminum) and the reproducibility by all parties including third parties.

Furthermore, there's much appeal to authority from the proponents, who keep pointing at certain studies, that only study one vaccine out of many. Epidemiologically it's a meaningless study due to it's healthy user bias. The other side has just a growing pile of studies, that point to mechanisms. They connect them to show how aluminum salts that don't dissolve in water, when administered via intramuscular injection (which happens at nearly all vaccinations), can cause autism. The most recent study came from 5 years ago, pointing that there may be a causal link between aluminum administered via vaccines and autism. The reason that their conclusion say that it may be so, is due to the absence of an inert placebo control group. In other words, if such a study is performed again, but with the presence of a placebo control group (double blind), it will either show the causal link or debunk that link. Mechanism on the other hand is already known. How do macrophages respond to aluminum particles that don't dissolve in water?

autism has a life expectancy of 36 years

whether you like it or not, it's in general about a neurodevelopmental disorder, in this, developmental delays fall under it's definition

whether it's the inflammation of the brain or an oxygen deficiency, it can manifest as such

vaccines dont cause autism

have you read this? https://archive.fo/Xy55r

im not bothered reding that

explain what it ses

the study has just made the question, just reading the conclusion is enough to know what the study says.

it says that aluminum vaccine adjuvants (which don't dissolve in water) may have a causal link with autism

where is the proof

when it comes to proof, they say that further research is warranted

for now, there's neither evidence that shows the aluminum has a causal link, nor evidence that debunks that link between aluminum and autism

in fact, debunking without evidence is unscientific

yes

so it doesnt cause aautism

that's only proven by the studies that have a healthy user bias present, which at the same time just tested one vaccine and didn't look for the other vaccines

furthermore the scientists behind the study that "debunks" the link have stocks in pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, so what would you expect from these scientists?

did you know that manufacturers can't be held accountable for vaccine injury?

ooft

where is proof that it actually causes autis?

there you go again, burden of proof

whats wrong with needing of proof

the focus was on the functionality, lets move onto the mechanism

the mechanism has enough to say, connecting the dots will come to that conclusion

non of those can apply without proof

here's the pile

sheeple sent me a chart showing people with autism when vaccined and how many people with autism without being vaccined

which was biased

one of the statements is that the immune activation in the brain is causal factor for NDDs

i have very low space

cant download

you need a PC

im on a mac

same thing

how much ram at maximum?

200mb

8gb for my pc

ooft