Message from @Alexandre

Discord ID: 574221001152397316


2019-05-03 20:50:21 UTC  

Also saying that is cute because you didn't give me an option to learn earlier

2019-05-03 21:10:56 UTC  

vax your children now ligma is spreading

2019-05-03 22:11:46 UTC  

I didnt give you an option to learn? What does that even mean?

2019-05-03 22:12:20 UTC  

Says the globe earther

2019-05-03 22:14:34 UTC  

The globe earther that thinks the CDC has bad grammar and doesn't take the CDC seriously.

2019-05-03 22:14:36 UTC  

😂

2019-05-03 22:17:16 UTC  

80,000 people died from the flu in 2017 2018 winter in the US

2019-05-03 22:17:31 UTC  

How many died of measels?

2019-05-03 22:21:58 UTC  

The Public Health Reports study also found that families of unvaccinated kids are more likely to be:
• Wealthier on average, with annual incomes more than four times the poverty level
• Non-Hispanic white
• Married couples in English-speaking households
• Educated, with college degrees, and
• Covered by private health insurance.

2019-05-03 22:34:22 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/552285797038948364/574000832094273546/Screenshot_20190503-153402_Drive.jpg

2019-05-03 22:35:55 UTC  

Only about 70% of children are vaccinated with 7 series

2019-05-03 22:44:28 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/552285797038948364/574003373603553293/Screenshot_20190503-154420_Drive.jpg

2019-05-04 01:21:20 UTC  

Interesting info there

2019-05-04 11:35:24 UTC  

safety remains the main priority, over the fact that still no long term studies have been done. These studies need the following criteria for proper safety testing: latency for at least 10 years, the presence of an inert placebo group (saline as placebo, not aluminum) and the reproducibility by all parties including third parties.

Furthermore, there's much appeal to authority from the proponents, who keep pointing at certain studies, that only study one vaccine out of many. Epidemiologically it's a meaningless study due to it's healthy user bias. The other side has just a growing pile of studies, that point to mechanisms. They connect them to show how aluminum salts that don't dissolve in water, when administered via intramuscular injection (which happens at nearly all vaccinations), can cause autism. The most recent study came from 5 years ago, pointing that there may be a causal link between aluminum administered via vaccines and autism. The reason that their conclusion say that it may be so, is due to the absence of an inert placebo control group. In other words, if such a study is performed again, but with the presence of a placebo control group (double blind), it will either show the causal link or debunk that link. Mechanism on the other hand is already known. How do macrophages respond to aluminum particles that don't dissolve in water?

2019-05-04 13:01:39 UTC  

autism has a life expectancy of 36 years

2019-05-04 13:02:20 UTC  

whether you like it or not, it's in general about a neurodevelopmental disorder, in this, developmental delays fall under it's definition

2019-05-04 13:03:09 UTC  

whether it's the inflammation of the brain or an oxygen deficiency, it can manifest as such

2019-05-04 13:04:56 UTC  

vaccines dont cause autism

2019-05-04 13:07:29 UTC  

have you read this? https://archive.fo/Xy55r

2019-05-04 13:09:09 UTC  

im not bothered reding that

2019-05-04 13:09:15 UTC  

explain what it ses

2019-05-04 13:09:37 UTC  

the study has just made the question, just reading the conclusion is enough to know what the study says.

2019-05-04 13:10:03 UTC  

it says that aluminum vaccine adjuvants (which don't dissolve in water) may have a causal link with autism

2019-05-04 13:10:51 UTC  

where is the proof

2019-05-04 13:11:11 UTC  

when it comes to proof, they say that further research is warranted

2019-05-04 13:11:42 UTC  

for now, there's neither evidence that shows the aluminum has a causal link, nor evidence that debunks that link between aluminum and autism

2019-05-04 13:12:09 UTC  

in fact, debunking without evidence is unscientific

2019-05-04 13:12:22 UTC  

yes

2019-05-04 13:12:32 UTC  

so it doesnt cause aautism

2019-05-04 13:13:49 UTC  

that's only proven by the studies that have a healthy user bias present, which at the same time just tested one vaccine and didn't look for the other vaccines

2019-05-04 13:14:39 UTC  

furthermore the scientists behind the study that "debunks" the link have stocks in pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, so what would you expect from these scientists?

2019-05-04 13:15:11 UTC  

did you know that manufacturers can't be held accountable for vaccine injury?

2019-05-04 13:15:25 UTC  

ooft

2019-05-04 13:15:52 UTC  

where is proof that it actually causes autis?

2019-05-04 13:16:08 UTC  

there you go again, burden of proof

2019-05-04 13:16:26 UTC  

whats wrong with needing of proof

2019-05-04 13:16:39 UTC  

the focus was on the functionality, lets move onto the mechanism

2019-05-04 13:16:57 UTC  

the mechanism has enough to say, connecting the dots will come to that conclusion

2019-05-04 13:17:08 UTC  

non of those can apply without proof

2019-05-04 13:17:33 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/552285797038948364/574223091887243264/Autism-and-aluminum-adjuvants-in-vaccines.pdf

2019-05-04 13:17:36 UTC  

here's the pile