in fact, debunking without evidence is unscientific

yes

so it doesnt cause aautism

that's only proven by the studies that have a healthy user bias present, which at the same time just tested one vaccine and didn't look for the other vaccines

furthermore the scientists behind the study that "debunks" the link have stocks in pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, so what would you expect from these scientists?

did you know that manufacturers can't be held accountable for vaccine injury?

ooft

where is proof that it actually causes autis?

there you go again, burden of proof

whats wrong with needing of proof

the focus was on the functionality, lets move onto the mechanism

the mechanism has enough to say, connecting the dots will come to that conclusion

non of those can apply without proof

here's the pile

sheeple sent me a chart showing people with autism when vaccined and how many people with autism without being vaccined

which was biased

one of the statements is that the immune activation in the brain is causal factor for NDDs

i have very low space

cant download

you need a PC

im on a mac

same thing

how much ram at maximum?

200mb

8gb for my pc

ooft

capacity of C drive is 111 gb

oh my

so much

yup

but

when it comes to buying a good pc, it's better to have one that's a beast

there is no proof that vaccines cause autism

just sayin

http://vaccinepapers.org/review-paper-al-adjuvant-autism-20-pages-97-references/

there's neither proof that says otherwise

which is the reason it's still up for research and debate

what made people think that vaccines cause utism

what they or their friends experienced

seeing a child going in regression, shortly after vaccination, no longer being able to do what they've reached before