Message from @Alexandre
Discord ID: 574228690079318017
it also does for the opposite
No
LOL
yes and vaccines dont cause autism
wazzaaaah
Thats not how burden of proof works
Lmao do you know what it means
bullocks
some people cannot have vaccines due to allergies
allergic to eggs
sometimes sensitive to polysorbate 80
which is like 10 peeps in my school
Thats like
“God exist.”
“Prove it.”
“Prove to me god doesnt exist then!”
Burden of proof falls on the initial claim aka “vaccines cause autism”
prove that vaccines cause autism
the existence of God is neither proven nor disproven, there are just theories behind it based on reason alone
Lmao bruh
This is just about the phrasing you used “burden of proof”
Okay fine prove me a negative
the burden of proof falls on both
NO
Okay wanna see how thos works
where is proof
Prove to me that invisible purple monsters dont exist
stop avoiding it
prove it
Prove it
here's another problem, strawman and false dichotomy
avoiding as usual
Lance, burden of proof does not fall on both parties in this situation. If you believe that then you fundamentally dont understand the term “burden of proof”
very typical of anti vax
I've already said, there's no conclusive proof
so
there's just mixed publications
it doesnt cause autism
who follows Corbett Report?
nope
never heard of it
and from this discussion
vaccines dont causie autism