Non peer reviewed

🤔

@Lancelot burden of proof falls on the claim of “vaccines cause autism”

Thats how burden of proof works

No

LOL

Thats not how burden of proof works

Lmao do you know what it means

Thats like
“God exist.”
“Prove it.”
“Prove to me god doesnt exist then!”

Burden of proof falls on the initial claim aka “vaccines cause autism”

Lmao bruh

This is just about the phrasing you used “burden of proof”

Okay fine prove me a negative

NO

Okay wanna see how thos works

Prove to me that invisible purple monsters dont exist

Prove it

Lance, burden of proof does not fall on both parties in this situation. If you believe that then you fundamentally dont understand the term “burden of proof”