so most of the 1200 people in my school are vaccinated

and there was no autism

@Lancelot burden of proof falls on the claim of “vaccines cause autism”

Thats how burden of proof works

it also does for the opposite

No

LOL

yes and vaccines dont cause autism

wazzaaaah

Thats not how burden of proof works

Lmao do you know what it means

bullocks

some people cannot have vaccines due to allergies

allergic to eggs

sometimes sensitive to polysorbate 80

which is like 10 peeps in my school

Thats like
“God exist.”
“Prove it.”
“Prove to me god doesnt exist then!”

Burden of proof falls on the initial claim aka “vaccines cause autism”

prove that vaccines cause autism

the existence of God is neither proven nor disproven, there are just theories behind it based on reason alone

Lmao bruh

This is just about the phrasing you used “burden of proof”

Okay fine prove me a negative

the burden of proof falls on both

so vaccines dont casue autism

NO

Okay wanna see how thos works

where is proof

Prove to me that invisible purple monsters dont exist

stop avoiding it

prove it

Prove it

here's another problem, strawman and false dichotomy

avoiding as usual

Lance, burden of proof does not fall on both parties in this situation. If you believe that then you fundamentally dont understand the term “burden of proof”

very typical of anti vax

I've already said, there's no conclusive proof

so

there's just mixed publications

it doesnt cause autism

who follows Corbett Report?