Message from @Alexandre
Discord ID: 574229351470596096
This is just about the phrasing you used “burden of proof”
Okay fine prove me a negative
the burden of proof falls on both
so vaccines dont casue autism
NO
Okay wanna see how thos works
where is proof
Prove to me that invisible purple monsters dont exist
stop avoiding it
prove it
Prove it
here's another problem, strawman and false dichotomy
avoiding as usual
Lance, burden of proof does not fall on both parties in this situation. If you believe that then you fundamentally dont understand the term “burden of proof”
very typical of anti vax
I've already said, there's no conclusive proof
so
there's just mixed publications
it doesnt cause autism
who follows Corbett Report?
never heard of it
and from this discussion
vaccines dont causie autism
it's more accurate to say that vaccines could cause autism
this especially applies when it contain aluminium salts
but where is proof
the proof says it could, I've already shown the publication
@Alexandre#2107 you remind me of a robot
@Pinnaplia you have nothing of value to add here. When will you show us real information? Or do you have none? Just opinion?
Source is CDC
@Pinnaplia
The globe earther that thinks the CDC has bad grammar and doesn't take the CDC seriously.
he left
probably a shill
Someone muted him
Hey any anti-vaxxers here, explain how vaccines cause harm and cause autism
they dont
Explain how they dont