i think that the sun's radiation not being strong enough to melt ice caps is *very* much physics

K you are indoctrinated

Was co2 many times higher in the past and did life thrive?

K you are boring to talk to. You have a belief system because you have been indoctrinated by liberal politicians who have paid for fake climate science by agencies like nasa

Gtg bye

so me doing research independent of anyone else's interests because i was curious as to see if it was actually true about climate change is indoctrination? CO2 has been high in the past while complex life has existed but they didn't need to use cognitive functions like we do now. they used cognitive functions to hunt and seek shelter from rains etc. which i personally wouldn't call complex thought

wouldn’t you say that your belief system is also biased since you don’t seem open to hearing what koro was saying

so again just going back to indoctrination when i did this research to see if what they were saying is true or not and found that if anything that it was under played by the media

Show the data

again i think it's in the attic as it's not in my office space and i don't have a key

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations

Disprove me.

You are lying. @Koro

I dont believe you.

@mysweettart ive heard what these fear mongers say. We are all going to die in 12 years.

Its a scam

To steal money through taxes

Show the data and experiment

so again i'll refer back to what i said about the cognitive inhibitions that i suffered trying to do what is to me fairly basic maths and the time it was taking me increasing instead of decreasing like you would expect as someone becomes more practised in doing those questions

Your numbers are wrong

so i've explained the experiments i just need to find the records of the data

Look it up

my numbers are wrong? yeah they are going to be slightly out since i don't have the data with me

this was conducted to try and disprove climate change not prove it

if anything my experiments were biased as i didn't fully believe what i was being told

More than slightly

You are completely wrong

Are you a persistent debate troll?

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations
Disprove me.

ok so when i get that data out and drop it, which is a precise record of what happened, which were designed to disprove climate change is more than slightly wrong?

i'm no persistent debate troll

ik what the hell i'm talking about

Show the data

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations
Disprove me.

Lol

again how many times do i have to say this to you? it's locked in the attic and i don't have a key

Co2 is making earth green. Disprove me

honestly ur starting to sound more like a persistent debate troll than me here

CO2 would be going down or staying the same if it was making the earth green as more plants would be absorbing it

If you lowered co2 by 20%. The forests wouldnt grow back fast enough for our consumption based off current levels of deforestation. Disprove me.

Increased co2 helps plants which helps us