so again i'll refer back to what i said about the cognitive inhibitions that i suffered trying to do what is to me fairly basic maths and the time it was taking me increasing instead of decreasing like you would expect as someone becomes more practised in doing those questions

Your numbers are wrong

so i've explained the experiments i just need to find the records of the data

Look it up

my numbers are wrong? yeah they are going to be slightly out since i don't have the data with me

this was conducted to try and disprove climate change not prove it

if anything my experiments were biased as i didn't fully believe what i was being told

More than slightly

You are completely wrong

Are you a persistent debate troll?

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations
Disprove me.

ok so when i get that data out and drop it, which is a precise record of what happened, which were designed to disprove climate change is more than slightly wrong?

i'm no persistent debate troll

ik what the hell i'm talking about

Show the data

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations
Disprove me.

Lol

again how many times do i have to say this to you? it's locked in the attic and i don't have a key

Co2 is making earth green. Disprove me

honestly ur starting to sound more like a persistent debate troll than me here

CO2 would be going down or staying the same if it was making the earth green as more plants would be absorbing it

If you lowered co2 by 20%. The forests wouldnt grow back fast enough for our consumption based off current levels of deforestation. Disprove me.

Increased co2 helps plants which helps us

so deforestation is happening faster than trees are growing back especially in rainforests so they're not growing back fast enough anyway so how is the earth becoming more green

if the level of CO2 was lowered by 20% there would be no chance that they could grow back is true

More co2 means less disease, less water consumption needed. Healthier, bigger crops.

We need a 50% increase

hold on a second, how is less water consumption needed? if a plant is photosynthesising then it needs one mole of water to one mole of CO2 so it definitely would not need less water by any means. and how is it going to cause less disease?

*6 moles of water to 6 moles of CO2

More co2 means trees and plants will grow in more arid regions

ok so why are we seeing accelerated desertification instead of more vegetation in arid and semi arid regions?

There is some other things as well but i think your mind is closed so you wont even bother looking into it. So i wont mention it.

ok so as someone who tried to disprove climate change you'r telling me that my mind is closed?

@Koro we are not seeing desertification. We are seeing a greening earth

i think i'm actually talking to a debate troll

so the fact that india in its entirety is at risk of desertification is us not seeing desertification? and the masses of deforestation and less growth in arid and semi arid regions is a greening earth?

Show me your data.

Ok. Show me the data of your experiment from someone else

Show me how you know earth is becoming greener and not unhealthier.

I don’t have any data to show, I’m not the one making arguments.

Plant a seed