I dont think light gets destroyed because of distance.

Light can travel downwards from the sun an infinite distance.

Whats the vanishing point

Is the vanishing point fake?

When objects vanish near eye level at a distance

Not saying its fake

Ok. Thx.

Im saying the light from the sun would be able to travel from the source to the ground

Yes I'm unmuted

I'd like to recant my statement by the way @Citizen Z

Earths round btw

Peace

Alright, <@!282871038511939584> has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Moonman lmao

CmonBruh

!mute <@282871038511939584>

Moonman#2783 (282871038511939584) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

Are you a spinning monkey baller? <@413153787801501697>

Alright, <@!413153787801501697> has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Why do you believe the earth is flat with no concrete proof

I don’t know why but I can imagine it’s because they have nothing better to do or they just don’t get that not everything is fake

@Deleted User there is concrete proof

Impossible sight distances and direct measurements

Why do you believe in a spinning water ball inside a vacuum? Impossible physics that will never be proven...

proof density alone can't make things fall/sink

Alright, @SeekingTruth has been warned for '**Duplicated text**'.

oh

yeah sure

https://gyazo.com/74ed941ed3bcfd7803e11de0469702d9 I apply gravity to the situation, boom. See, water seeks to be level, not flat. It simply means it tries to spread equally all over.

Ah, in case you want some math of why it happens, here it is, with vector visualization and graph. https://gyazo.com/27631aad8b2743e3e61f56680678c9c1

Notice that one of the drops is kinda orbiting around, but hitting the floor. I've also heard a few peeps say that orbits make no sense, even with gravity. Well, here's an orbit with vector visualization with vertical and horizontal components. https://gyazo.com/40f8fa27600f6719403ad151ee48b95a

Huh

If you do the math too, it works just right. - Oh and also, buoyancy is NOT antigravity. Here's 3 objects, each of them have the exact same mass (and therefore the same weight). The only thing that changes is their volume. https://gyazo.com/2fdf4732e6e44682c31b405037803045

anyone want to go in the debate voice chat?

As you can see, all of them have the exact same vector for gravity. But the buoyant force( which is always directly opposite to gravity's) counteracts it. - Here are 3 objects, the exact same, submerged in water, but without gravity. https://gyazo.com/65c4e72c73445bd76759860b95f02a48

Gravity is an observation

Hm, there seems to be a problem... nothing sinks nor floats. That's because gravity is required for buoyancy to exist. Even though the object on the left is less dense than the water, and the 2 on the right are less dense. Huh hold on Notice how the force of buoyancy only depends on the volume, and not the mass. 2 objects with the same volume have the same buoyancy (air lift) https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/562611254443769863/562709851252326418/unknown.png?width=423&height=450

Now, depending on mass, the force of gravity will change. This is why density is related with it indirectly.

It doesnt prove anything

go in the debate vc wuth me

Im not reading that