Message from @YahYett
Discord ID: 570762484982743040
Or how to successfully apply renormalization after applying perturbation theory to gravity
You don't understand.
How about we ask experts in the field if I'm such an idiot?
Curving spacetime is the issue.
Do you even know GR?
I've already spoken to "experts in the field"
Majority of what I'm saying is physics established by scientist that believe your model.
And?
Define gravity in GR.
Not "my model", but continue
astral doesnt believe in the globe
🤔
Then why is he defending gravity?
You don't even know GR
Because it works well in terms of what was tested of it. A lot of it connects quite well to the equivalence principle
GR's gravity has no actual proof
As a mathematical model it can predict things that align with the *globe* model
But when it comes to FE it doesn't
And the math behind GR leads to contradictions within itself
97 eleven
As sure as I am that GR is utter nonsense
smart people are starting to realize whats going on
It sorta can, like Universal Acceleration, and what that all implies
UA is wrong
If you believe in the FES nonsense then you're completely wrong
Even globe earthers can debunk UA
Equivalence principle demonstrates it as an adequate model of local gravity
Define the equivalence principle
What's the source of the acceleration
UA is made by a controlled opposition group
The effects of our observed local gravitational field cannot be experimentally distinguished from an accelerated frame of reference.
Thats off google fyi ^
Pretty much
Word for word
Lmao
So you have no clue what you are talking about
Tell me this
Why did we first determine the equivalence principle
Not word for word
What mathematical relation led to it