Message from @YahYett
Discord ID: 570763927638638615
Then why is he defending gravity?
You don't even know GR
Because it works well in terms of what was tested of it. A lot of it connects quite well to the equivalence principle
GR's gravity has no actual proof
As a mathematical model it can predict things that align with the *globe* model
But when it comes to FE it doesn't
And the math behind GR leads to contradictions within itself
97 eleven
You sure ur fe?
As sure as I am that GR is utter nonsense
smart people are starting to realize whats going on
It sorta can, like Universal Acceleration, and what that all implies
UA is wrong
If you believe in the FES nonsense then you're completely wrong
Even globe earthers can debunk UA
Equivalence principle demonstrates it as an adequate model of local gravity
Define the equivalence principle
What's the source of the acceleration
UA is made by a controlled opposition group
The effects of our observed local gravitational field cannot be experimentally distinguished from an accelerated frame of reference.
Pretty much
Word for word
Lmao
So you have no clue what you are talking about
Tell me this
Why did we first determine the equivalence principle
Not word for word
What mathematical relation led to it
You tell me
🤔
I asked the question
He will google it
I'll wait
Nothing wrong with that, but I won't.
You tell me, I admit I don't know the answer to that
Since I assume you are making a point
Then dont get into an argument you cant win
It arises due to the fact that gravational mass is exactly equal to inertial mads
Mass*
Which is why i decided not to continue
97 why dont u explain something simple to them like boats going over the curve