@AstralSentient Do you even know QM

@AstralSentient while yes, we cannot explain what EXACTLY gravity is, how it forms, why it exists... We do know the fundamental ways in which is affects out everyday life which we have been able to prove by using experiments.

97 u are in new york u go east do u circumnavigate the globe or end up at the equator this would be on the globe model

To claim a theory requires further advancement requires a decent understanding of said topic

@jeremy the globe model is wrong so I dont categories

Care*

ok

Wait wait wait

@AstralSentient and what part of QM requires further advancement

So you appear to understand the sciences but think the globe model is wrong....?

Our understanding of how it connects to gravity

How bout that?

There is no connection to gravity, and there never will be

Show me how to quantise the metric tensor of the einstein-hilbert field equations

So because gravity breaks down at the quantum level, we can disregard all of the success of Newtonian and GR?
Seems legit

Or how to successfully apply renormalization after applying perturbation theory to gravity

You don't understand.

How about we ask experts in the field if I'm such an idiot?

Curving spacetime is the issue.

Do you even know GR?

I've already spoken to "experts in the field"

Majority of what I'm saying is physics established by scientist that believe your model.

And?

Define gravity in GR.

Not "my model", but continue

astral doesnt believe in the globe

🤔

Then why is he defending gravity?

You don't even know GR

Because it works well in terms of what was tested of it. A lot of it connects quite well to the equivalence principle

GR's gravity has no actual proof

As a mathematical model it can predict things that align with the *globe* model

But when it comes to FE it doesn't

And the math behind GR leads to contradictions within itself

97 eleven

You sure ur fe?

As sure as I am that GR is utter nonsense

smart people are starting to realize whats going on

It sorta can, like Universal Acceleration, and what that all implies

UA is wrong

If you believe in the FES nonsense then you're completely wrong