Both

The first sentence was to both of you

No but most fe dont know basic fundamental sciences

No, that is not my argument

I'm not "most fe"

I never counted you as one

Which clearly tou are not

And i actually do respect that

My claim is that your premises are correct but wrongly applied because you choose to ignore a wealth of other support in light of something needing further advancement

97 eleven let me ask u think

let me ask u th is please

Identify what needs further advancement

Quantum mechanics

if you are in new york and you go east do u circumnavigate or end up at the equator

97

I'm starting to assume that you are someone who doesn't possess any knowledge of advanced physics

This again...

Yep there we are

ijust wanna see waht he says astral lol

@AstralSentient Do you even know QM

@AstralSentient while yes, we cannot explain what EXACTLY gravity is, how it forms, why it exists... We do know the fundamental ways in which is affects out everyday life which we have been able to prove by using experiments.

97 u are in new york u go east do u circumnavigate the globe or end up at the equator this would be on the globe model

To claim a theory requires further advancement requires a decent understanding of said topic

@jeremy the globe model is wrong so I dont categories

Care*

ok

Wait wait wait

@AstralSentient and what part of QM requires further advancement

So you appear to understand the sciences but think the globe model is wrong....?

Our understanding of how it connects to gravity

How bout that?

There is no connection to gravity, and there never will be

Show me how to quantise the metric tensor of the einstein-hilbert field equations

So because gravity breaks down at the quantum level, we can disregard all of the success of Newtonian and GR?
Seems legit

Or how to successfully apply renormalization after applying perturbation theory to gravity

You don't understand.

How about we ask experts in the field if I'm such an idiot?

Curving spacetime is the issue.

Do you even know GR?

I've already spoken to "experts in the field"

Majority of what I'm saying is physics established by scientist that believe your model.