Message from @jeremy
Discord ID: 575058534383747072
It isn't. Newtonian physics don't apply to minkowski space for special relativity.
ok
That's why we don't use Newtonian physics because they don't sufficiently explain gravity in its fullest form
where did ur insane definition of gravity come from ?
Particle physics and quantum mechanics.
thats like theoretical science ?
the hadron collider is particle physics ?
Not all of it
No, why would you think it's theoretical?
quantam mechanics ? i thought that was theoretical
It isn't.
The calculations are.
so some of it is theory ?
But the predictions of the calculations are put very much into practice.
Theory backed up with proof and experimentation that show it to be true
but not facts?
jsut theory ?
Theory that is shown to be true, ergo it is fact
Science doesn't deal with facts per se
so none of it is theory ?
Or do you want to keep sliding them goalposts
Oh, convenient that
Science constructs predictions based on calculations, observations and experiments
To give you a concrete example, according to radioactive decay theory, this Sr-90 probe has a β- decay. This means that after a certain amount of time, a neutron will decay into a proton by emitting an Electron, conserving electrical share, and an election anti-neutrino, conserving the lepton number. *In theory* if you put Sr-90 into a magnetic field, the electrons emitted should follow the magnetic lines into the desired direction. Depending on the strength of the magnetic field you can also determine the energy of the electrons.
Now the point of all this is because this is *literally* how we detect beta decay using certain Geiger counters. So clearly, the theory works both on paper and in experiments
Yes, it would seem so
Pfft, let's see
Gravity is unproven and self-contradicting
You can't defend something rooted in nonsense
How so
Elaborate, please
Can you give me one concrete proof of gravity?
Of mass attracting mass
No, because there is none
Gravity is unproven
Gravity is the accepted scientific norm, therefore it is up to you to provide the burden of proof that it is not correct
You claim that mass attracts mass
It's your burden to prove that
Appeal to authority fallacy doesn't work here