Message from @Σ5

Discord ID: 494073534126227456


2018-09-25 09:10:04 UTC  

the ammount the earth moves is absolutly tiny relative to where the stars are

2018-09-25 09:10:08 UTC  

we don't need to derive fake math, we aren't moving

2018-09-25 09:10:18 UTC  

we have no acceleration

2018-09-25 09:10:19 UTC  

we can detect some paralax of the closest stars but not beyond that

2018-09-25 09:10:25 UTC  

flat earth doesn't move, its stable

2018-09-25 09:10:36 UTC  

Yes, you do need to derive it.

2018-09-25 09:10:38 UTC  

so is globe earth in the "short term"

2018-09-25 09:10:42 UTC  

You said that the acceleration would be huge.

2018-09-25 09:10:47 UTC  

The only way to know this is to derive this.

2018-09-25 09:10:51 UTC  

Do so.

2018-09-25 09:11:04 UTC  

you do so and find a verry small ammount

2018-09-25 09:11:06 UTC  

I don't have to use fake math to disprove the globe

2018-09-25 09:11:12 UTC  

oh its fake

2018-09-25 09:11:17 UTC  

Use real maths then

2018-09-25 09:11:18 UTC  

please support the claim

2018-09-25 09:11:20 UTC  

your math to prove the globe is fake

2018-09-25 09:11:28 UTC  

please support this

2018-09-25 09:11:30 UTC  

einstien, proven to be false

2018-09-25 09:11:43 UTC  

look up the links yourself, he was wrong on multiple occassions

2018-09-25 09:11:48 UTC  

making us all a bitch

2018-09-25 09:11:49 UTC  

like i said if you supply blind assertions without supporting it il just block you

2018-09-25 09:11:58 UTC  

I'm telling you to look it up yourself

2018-09-25 09:12:01 UTC  

support your claim its fake math

2018-09-25 09:12:01 UTC  

I already linked it

2018-09-25 09:12:05 UTC  

Then use **real** maths and show how the acceleration is huge

2018-09-25 09:12:07 UTC  

you havent even looked at the equations

2018-09-25 09:12:23 UTC  

Fake maths shows the acceleration is small, use **real** maths and show how it comes out to be huge

2018-09-25 09:12:56 UTC  

the fact that you cant prove an equation is fake when you havent even looked at it

2018-09-25 09:13:12 UTC  

And if Einstein is proven to be wrong, how do I use Einstein's theories daily to predict things**BEFORE I'VE SEEN THEM** and then I measure them, and they come out as Einstein predicts?

2018-09-25 09:13:14 UTC  

@^Kevin^ he was wrong only with his idea of CISMOLOGICAL CONSTANT

2018-09-25 09:13:15 UTC  

blocked

2018-09-25 09:13:19 UTC  

He corrected himselr

2018-09-25 09:13:35 UTC  

And how tf does Einstein being wrong affect this debate

2018-09-25 09:13:58 UTC  
2018-09-25 09:14:12 UTC  

well its still possible general relativity can be shown to be wrong

2018-09-25 09:14:25 UTC  

but so far that hasent been done in a formal maner

2018-09-25 09:14:45 UTC  

blocking me doesn't make what I say wrong

2018-09-25 09:14:55 UTC  

just makes you prove your an ostrich

2018-09-25 09:15:06 UTC  

You know scientists are incredibly aware that they can be wrong and that models need to improve. That's why they threw out FE in the first place, it didn't fit

2018-09-25 09:15:06 UTC  

there are aspects of general relativity that is contradicted by quantum mechanics