but then again we cant sense velocity just relative velocity or aceleration

it also doesn't match reality

you look at the stars, it doesn't match reality

also the ammount of aceleration of the surface of earth is 0.01 m/s^2

if we were traveling thru space, the sun and all stuff moving all around, we wouldn't see the same stuff al lthe time

big dipper, not changing, same stuff over and over

because they are far away

keep in mind the enarest star is 4 lightyears awayu

if I was on different sides of the sun and it was moving thru space

i woudln't have the same skylight

I would see new stars

we don't see that

we see the same stars

we aren't circling the sun, its circling us

false

and we dont

we see the same stuff all thruout the year

@^Kevin^ ok, could you please derive how large the acceleration would be then?

same stuff

its testable and obvious

the ammount the earth moves is absolutly tiny relative to where the stars are

we don't need to derive fake math, we aren't moving

we have no acceleration

we can detect some paralax of the closest stars but not beyond that

flat earth doesn't move, its stable

Yes, you do need to derive it.

so is globe earth in the "short term"

You said that the acceleration would be huge.

The only way to know this is to derive this.

Do so.

you do so and find a verry small ammount

I don't have to use fake math to disprove the globe

oh its fake

Use real maths then

please support the claim

your math to prove the globe is fake

please support this

einstien, proven to be false

look up the links yourself, he was wrong on multiple occassions

making us all a bitch

like i said if you supply blind assertions without supporting it il just block you