@^Kevin^ ok, could you please derive how large the acceleration would be then?

same stuff

its testable and obvious

the ammount the earth moves is absolutly tiny relative to where the stars are

we don't need to derive fake math, we aren't moving

we have no acceleration

we can detect some paralax of the closest stars but not beyond that

flat earth doesn't move, its stable

Yes, you do need to derive it.

so is globe earth in the "short term"

You said that the acceleration would be huge.

The only way to know this is to derive this.

Do so.

you do so and find a verry small ammount

I don't have to use fake math to disprove the globe

oh its fake

Use real maths then

please support the claim

your math to prove the globe is fake

please support this

einstien, proven to be false

look up the links yourself, he was wrong on multiple occassions

making us all a bitch

like i said if you supply blind assertions without supporting it il just block you

I'm telling you to look it up yourself

support your claim its fake math

I already linked it

Then use **real** maths and show how the acceleration is huge

you havent even looked at the equations

Fake maths shows the acceleration is small, use **real** maths and show how it comes out to be huge

the fact that you cant prove an equation is fake when you havent even looked at it

And if Einstein is proven to be wrong, how do I use Einstein's theories daily to predict things**BEFORE I'VE SEEN THEM** and then I measure them, and they come out as Einstein predicts?

@^Kevin^ he was wrong only with his idea of CISMOLOGICAL CONSTANT

blocked

He corrected himselr

And how tf does Einstein being wrong affect this debate

https://www.businessinsider.com/physics-einstein-got-wrong-2015-11

https://youtu.be/Zgk8UdV7GQ0

well its still possible general relativity can be shown to be wrong

but so far that hasent been done in a formal maner

blocking me doesn't make what I say wrong