Message from @Σ5
Discord ID: 494099523090644994
Practically speaking the phylogenic classification has issues, which is why it's often suplimented
birds reptiles and mamals are in amniota
phylogenic clasification has problems in where you should put teh roadsigns
but its a similar problem in taxonomic clasification
Which is why we use DNA now
yes wich only helps tell you what the tree looks like
but dosent tell you where to put teh ropadsigns
the roadsigns are arbitrary but based on linean clasification
I'm gonna do a debate sin, but I'm gonna argue from status or whatever it's called. But I have a zoology degree I know how all this works.
so far it dosent seem like it
Oof
Bit rude
lol
anyway i have a wierd reptile i want to show yu
(if i can find it)
But you are being needlessly pendantic, i will also call Mammals reptiles as there is a clear line of descendance
pedantic*
Ironic
lol
I'm on my phone so I can't spell
altho its more likely you are going by
that the ancestor of them was reptilian
Well no, because you can track reptiles forwards to mammals.
mamals and lizards
Instead of backwards to plants
thats why i said its more likely the next thing i said
Dude, this is just being pedantic now
And I'm still a bit annoyed at you insulting my education and kinda being disrespectful
kiwi education is good education
it's the best in the world
i simply stated how it seems
along with aussie and finnish
although, personally, ive found australians to be _very_ dumb lol
Kiwi education is a solid 7/10
no offence intended
Idk I'm not Aussie
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS I used to be in another server with him, he does this all the time lol
@Moist Mayonnaise I get what you mean, this is just the same pedantic argument but it's not about conspiraces