Message from @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS
Discord ID: 494098447423504384
Read the whole thing
"while the Linnaean system is more useful for understanding how animals live."
im guessing your going to point to that
yes i agree
in ways
but that was never my point
it literaly says what i was saying
It also says what I was saying
false
well yes
<:why:492975944445853696>
<:smart:484956754489376781>
but its a false look at phyletic clasification
thats not what phylogenic clasification says
Practically speaking the phylogenic classification has issues, which is why it's often suplimented
birds reptiles and mamals are in amniota
phylogenic clasification has problems in where you should put teh roadsigns
but its a similar problem in taxonomic clasification
yes wich only helps tell you what the tree looks like
but dosent tell you where to put teh ropadsigns
the roadsigns are arbitrary but based on linean clasification
I'm gonna do a debate sin, but I'm gonna argue from status or whatever it's called. But I have a zoology degree I know how all this works.
so far it dosent seem like it
Oof
Bit rude
lol
anyway i have a wierd reptile i want to show yu
(if i can find it)
But you are being needlessly pendantic, i will also call Mammals reptiles as there is a clear line of descendance
pedantic*
Ironic
lol
I'm on my phone so I can't spell
that sounds like an argument that trees are mamals because they have a common ancestor
altho its more likely you are going by
that the ancestor of them was reptilian
Well no, because you can track reptiles forwards to mammals.
mamals and lizards