Message from @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS
Discord ID: 494100731943583744
that sounds like an argument that trees are mamals because they have a common ancestor
altho its more likely you are going by
that the ancestor of them was reptilian
Well no, because you can track reptiles forwards to mammals.
mamals and lizards
Instead of backwards to plants
thats why i said its more likely the next thing i said
Dude, this is just being pedantic now
And I'm still a bit annoyed at you insulting my education and kinda being disrespectful
kiwi education is good education
it's the best in the world
i simply stated how it seems
along with aussie and finnish
although, personally, ive found australians to be _very_ dumb lol
Kiwi education is a solid 7/10
no offence intended
Idk I'm not Aussie
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS I used to be in another server with him, he does this all the time lol
@Moist Mayonnaise I get what you mean, this is just the same pedantic argument but it's not about conspiraces
?
well im sorry they get into the deep aspects
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS I don''t really know anything about biology so can't really comment, but he regularly just spouts nonsense about things he doesn't understand then gets all self righteous
it always seems to reduce to semantical prtoblems
@Σ5 bruh we are just doing long "no u"s we aren't getting anywhere
okay please just stop saying pedantic
how about condescending?
no we where doing a long back and forth of me trying to explain its simply a matter of what you work with and how you clasify things
its simply a difrent clasification system
But to say birds are reptiles is a massive oversimplification, just like phylogenetic trees in general
and you saying its wrong because it dosent match your system
untill the end tho
@Σ5 what's up with the spellings?
because im not good at spelling
oh okay that's cool
also i tend to type too fast
It's over simplified not incorrect, but birds are reptiles is my pet peeve
birds are reptiles what?
ok
did i just read that?