Unfortunately with some folks you can’t fix stupid

What happened to new sons of.liberty that shit fell.off

they were great on paper.

Any idea is great on paper

Except communism

communism is great on paper.

Then the executions start happening to keep the ideals in ace

Place*

Communism is as immoral on paper as it is in reality.

in terms of function, yea

Talking to people that believe in communism do all sorts of mental gymnastics to make it sound like the best idea ever

They do*

Communism is inherently wrong. Restricting the ability of people to choose is the entire idea behind it, there is not a single way it looks good, excluding people looking at it from a skewed perspective. It's requires a hive mind to even function.

it requires*

I'm under the impression that instead of choosing from existing ideologies (most of which have failed in practice) it would be more prudent to develop a new system/model around the world we actually live in today..whereas the creators of every model in use today are dead and gone, remembered in statue form-disconnected from the reality of life in 2020.

Oh Reno is typing

So where do we put pictures of our new "toy"?

You don't.

@AbysmalWizard sounds like a good idea

But it's not a flame thrower

@winsupermario1234 get in general vc and mute your mic

I don't claim to have any bold new ideas to contribute, but i think bold new ideas might be important to developing beyond a two-party, 2-system model that seems like such a circus today

are you a commie? a capitalist?

It's not a 2 party system, it's supposed to be a 3

or something new, built on our current reality to make it the best possible

we need something else entirely maybe get rid of partisan politics

We need a renaissance. The issues we're facing are because people have completely forgotten the reason for the social studies. Our scientific advancements have far outpaced our philosophical advancements, both of which are equally important. Philosophy and historical knowledge should be the base of our movement, because they're vital to understanding the movement.

fair enough, @Zone-Tan, its still a matter of choice between people I wouldn't choose to govern even a minecraft server

A representing person from each state should be brought forth after a vote in state for which rep then you go forward with the traditional style of debate

oh

well said grecks

The problem with this obviously is the same as any sports game though with the most people in each state voting for their own state so example being CA vs let's say WY

Sorry had to drop out for family timr,

what has worked in the past? what has failed? what new ideas could be tested?

@juliet.one.alpha (OK) have a good one

The LAW being enforced equally no matter your status

perhaps candidates could be kept anonymous (lol) and we would then vote on the PLATFORM rather than the PERSON

you would have no guarantee there is more than one candidate

Do the black shadow interview

or that your vote is going to any particular candidate

then we vote on ideas alone and have an organization tasked with making the ideas a reality