But it's not a flame thrower

@winsupermario1234 get in general vc and mute your mic

I don't claim to have any bold new ideas to contribute, but i think bold new ideas might be important to developing beyond a two-party, 2-system model that seems like such a circus today

are you a commie? a capitalist?

It's not a 2 party system, it's supposed to be a 3

or something new, built on our current reality to make it the best possible

we need something else entirely maybe get rid of partisan politics

We need a renaissance. The issues we're facing are because people have completely forgotten the reason for the social studies. Our scientific advancements have far outpaced our philosophical advancements, both of which are equally important. Philosophy and historical knowledge should be the base of our movement, because they're vital to understanding the movement.

fair enough, @Zone-Tan, its still a matter of choice between people I wouldn't choose to govern even a minecraft server

A representing person from each state should be brought forth after a vote in state for which rep then you go forward with the traditional style of debate

oh

well said grecks

The problem with this obviously is the same as any sports game though with the most people in each state voting for their own state so example being CA vs let's say WY

Sorry had to drop out for family timr,

what has worked in the past? what has failed? what new ideas could be tested?

@juliet.one.alpha (OK) have a good one

The LAW being enforced equally no matter your status

perhaps candidates could be kept anonymous (lol) and we would then vote on the PLATFORM rather than the PERSON

you would have no guarantee there is more than one candidate

Do the black shadow interview

or that your vote is going to any particular candidate

then we vote on ideas alone and have an organization tasked with making the ideas a reality

by the people, for the people

Is it me or did the voice chat go silent?

theres a call still active

enforcement how?

AGI could help us govern impartially and with our best, most moral interests in mind

Do not acknowledge him.

@AbysmalWizard by a revised court and cleaning up of useless laws to make the enforce l enforcement of the law, this case the Constitution, clearer

Don't acknowledge me? What'd I do wrong?

Not you

The guy you were talking to

Had a bad guy name

At the end of the day NAZIS and Comunists are equally as bad

K

A massive overhaul of our courts and law enforcement is absolutely necessary.

Why would they change the system that protects them and keeps them in power and rich ^

Correct, we would need to sweep the laws clean off all the extra stuff added since the last amendment of the constitution. Even then we would need to abolish like 2-4 of them because they are slavery related and I'm sure we can all agree we could move on from that as a whole

pressure from everyone else for the removal of extreme inequity

@TacticalBeard because they have to be overthrown to make them Subject to the constitution

^