i know it's probably hard to say

Real collapse is a different scenario. A whole lot of Darwinism needs in that calculus.

Normal life - that equity needs a social pressure of what is/is not acceptable. We used to do that, but what's normal is smeared to carnival level goofyness.

recepy is simple

people who based their life on complete lie will lose the most in the end

what about in this slow adaptive decline? do you think different races/cultures would reach a breaking point at different points?

people who kept at least some senses and were mindful of the future will suffer less

i dont think tuaregs will suffer much from any collapse

dont take part in the scam and withdraw fromit as much as you can

AND COST IT AS MUCH MONEY AS POSSIBLE

http://www.amerika.org/politics/soft-genocide/

i've found that striving for a path between sanity and insanity means compromise to most

or rather solutions

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY= GENOCIDE

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION = GENOCIDE

must be gained through compromise between what works and has always worked and an idealistic 'promise' that things will be better

@vry_o "what about in this slow adaptive decline? do you think different races/cultures would reach a breaking point at different points?"


Most certainly. If this is a question, it is a question of how it will affect us. When we are getting our shit together, are we going to have to deal with other groups' bullshit? I would say yes and we should plan accordingly. The animus will be from the first time they notice real splintering among their groups. We might even have to worry about smarter groups of non-Whites wanting to interfere and even conquer. We might have to deal with diversity hoards with significant White numbers, White trash groups that want to undermine the "normies" which would mean us in this instance (or the vanillas cuz they always assume other of their own who have their shit together are vanillas) homogeneous antifas who will still cling to the moniker even as government dies, smart blacks for us (both allies as well as those who desire to integrate) smart blacks against us (competitiors) the usual high IQ minorities, the mestizos who are always in between but will see a similar splintering as the blacks, SEA's following suit and all the while, growing trepidation among our own numbers that we might be wrong about this whole "homogeneity" thing. Maybe we ARE all in this together.

Rather, this is just how I see it if we don't manage to remove the detritus first.

race riots are indicative of an innate hostility toward framework laid by the host culture

modernity 101 - lack of groups, lack of defined loyalties

friend to everyone and no one

liable to everyone and no one

i appreciate the detailed response

nobody has either competition or enemies and in group loyalties are discouraged unless you are a Jew or Bill Gates

@everyone https://voat.co/v/niggers/1646703

You are a global citizen with equal empathy and concern for everyone, which necessarilly means no one

@vry_o I appreciate your rather poignant questions. Are you John Steel by any chance? You seem similar to him to me for some reason.

management of such vast abstract groups is painfull by definition

since management is not a reflex but a job

@Mother I read that on instapundit and thought it had to be a parody article...

no, i'm just some fag that wants to have kids and not be guilty for bringing them into a sick world

Nope recording included of it lol

@vry_o I just take the long view to deal with it

Good lord. TBH I'm glad it wasnt that dopey fucking Sheila Jackson Lee from Houston again.

It's not like I have a say in whether or not we are having more

:D

My brood of daywalkers

remember vig when i was going on about simplicity, and noticing the demands of others. what they expect of you, as a good person is like some unspoken agreement that you have no choice in

why smart people suicide

I remember

because by definition everyone can't be helpful to everyone, the paramount social more of modernity is to FEIGN concern and virtue signal