Kvädare - 01/23/2017
If being a language must be part of art's definition, then it would not be art
But it is beautiful (the system itself, and what can be done within it)
spacepolenta - 01/23/2017
There is a tangible effect and something interesting about the psychodynamics, one could argue, but I don't think it's artistic
Kvädare - 01/23/2017
that is why I think of it in the same way that I think of art
spacepolenta - 01/23/2017
I feel like you are a bit euphemistic in your use of the word art, but I see where you are coming from
Pants Versacianno - 01/23/2017
@Hagel are you trying to defend the years you burned playing competitive star craft by rationalizing it as some great pursuit
it seems a bit like that to me
I'd wager that most people, even snooty art types, watch a game reply and think of it no more than watching two people play a game
Like I dunno chess
Because spectating these things don't produce aesthetic experience
Nester - 01/23/2017
Art would be senselessly defined were it not defined as the fixed and uninteractive product of someone wishing to convey insight through disciplined expression, as it would not preclude countless things from qualifying were meaning possibly derivable through contrived interpretations.
Picking nose hairs could potentially then be art.
