The elites understand that there is an order in nature that simply "is"

Not should be

The conviction that hierarchy of things must exist

That superior things have to be really superior, and inferior really inferior

And that it is their natural order

Aristocratic forms of government are established in obediance of this sacred principle

So what matters is hierarchy

?

Economy, as merely a form of exchange, therefore is absolutely subjected to *qualitative* relationis, which are personal

Economy as a quantitative form of exhange, therefore cannot supress and replace a qualitative organization, which is abstractly and theoretically, the state itself

Aristocratic state is nothing else but it's elite and of course, the religion

Aristocratic state is therefore this *quality* itself

What makes something superior to something else rather than, say, different

"we the people" is just a bushwacking drivel

Quite frankly spoken, the superior in terms of these castes, is essentially a personal quality

valor, bravery, intelligence, etc

In most aristocratic societies, the elites were extremely suspicio of presence of such qualities among low castes

Because statistically, they were usually right

which is why the idea of aristocracy just drives the current masses mad with rage.

Not necessarily

I may have made too large a claim. Many are driven mad, not all.

Consider Roman Republic. It's borders were essentially the city of Rome. It was easy for a slave to escape to his freedom

But few chose to do so

People aren't at war all the time

Because the relative safety and comfort of the life of servitued in a house of a Roman noble man was in many ways his comfort zone

It seems to be a natural virtue in some to admire and want to emulate superiors, rather than trash them. This virtue has been undermined today, but is not absent totally.

valor and bravery are synonymous

Feudal peasants who fight for their barons were plenty brave

Intelligence is left

Most of the slave rebellions in Roman era were started by slave who worked in agriculture, since their life was harder

So they display bravery

For many peasants, to leave their lands and actually go to war was a privillege already great enough

Again, not because things "should be that way' but because that was the reality of those times

it was part of verbal contacts

All of the land was divided among knights and noble men, and nowhere could you just "travel" and go just like that

Everyone had his purpose specifically designed for him since the day he was born

So if I'm understanding you, what is important is hierarchy and its arrangement according to intelligence?

The important thing to understand today is that we cannot possibly achieve something like that

Since there are no essential values today from which to begin, no reference points

feudalism of Europe came about well after a market system with different values than those needed for feudalism to work

We can theoretically only imagine some sort of a new fall of current civilization to imagine a new sort of order arising in it's place, but such scenarios are largely today thought to be apocalyptic