Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 291226084932976643
THEN THEY ARE NOT STRONG
CF NIETZSCHE SLAVES AND MASTERS
THE STRONG DO NOT DESIRE THE WEAK
there is no way of engineering a "system" that will not fail. Why try?
EXACTLY
The point isn't to make a perfect system that doesn't fail, but to make an adaptable system
CUT OUT THE MIDDLEMAN
THAT SYSTEM IS BIOLOGY, @fallot
HAIL THE WEAK
introduced inefficiency
SODOMIZE THE STRONG
OH WAIT
HAIL THE STRONG
SODOMIZE THE WEAK
and sometimes, you have to ditch the system, so whatever
YOU HAVE THOSE TWO OPTIONS
"make an adaptable system" makes me suspicious and crabby.
(1) HAIL THE WEAK, OR
(2) HAIL THE STRONG
@Jake Saga ME TOO
LIKE ANAL ITCHING
it's barebones
@fallot AGREED ON SIMPLICITY
"make an adaptable system" sounds pozzed. liberal. 😃
there is a lot of nuance and discretion involved
BEST "SYSTEM" = RELY ON HUMAN QUALITY
AGAIN WITH THE QUALITITATIVE
OY McVEIGH
NUANCE IS INHERENT TO LIFE
the state isn't such a bad thing, it's the current bureaucratic/mandarin PC state that makes it all look bad
DISCRETION = RELIANCE ON PEOPLE QUALITY
THE STATE IS ASS
SORRY CANNOT AGREE WITH YOU THERE
THE STATE ALWAYS TENDS TOWARD THIS SINECURE/MANDARIN INSANITY
IT IS THE NATURE OF THE STATE
well that's why you need that "qualitative" element
REPLACE WITH ARISTOCRACY
you put something on top of them
NEIN
aristocracy is still state