Message from @diversity_is_racism
Discord ID: 291226485447065602
and sometimes, you have to ditch the system, so whatever
YOU HAVE THOSE TWO OPTIONS
"make an adaptable system" makes me suspicious and crabby.
(1) HAIL THE WEAK, OR
(2) HAIL THE STRONG
@Jake Saga ME TOO
an adaptable system is not complex, it's simple
LIKE ANAL ITCHING
it's barebones
@fallot AGREED ON SIMPLICITY
"make an adaptable system" sounds pozzed. liberal. 😃
there is a lot of nuance and discretion involved
BEST "SYSTEM" = RELY ON HUMAN QUALITY
AGAIN WITH THE QUALITITATIVE
OY McVEIGH
NUANCE IS INHERENT TO LIFE
the state isn't such a bad thing, it's the current bureaucratic/mandarin PC state that makes it all look bad
DISCRETION = RELIANCE ON PEOPLE QUALITY
THE STATE IS ASS
SORRY CANNOT AGREE WITH YOU THERE
IT IS THE NATURE OF THE STATE
well that's why you need that "qualitative" element
REPLACE WITH ARISTOCRACY
you put something on top of them
NEIN
aristocracy is still state
QUALITATIVE IS INHERENT TO LIFE
SIMPLE EFFECTIVE METHODS LEAD TO MORE COMPLEX ONES
even with aristocrats, at a certain level of complexity
you need mandarins to run shit
NO, PER NIETZSCHE, THE STATE IS THE OPPOSITE OF ARISTOCRACY
whatever, he cried over some dead horse
Aristocracies if strong need FEWER bureaucrats. Stronger executive, more coherent society requires less oversight.
Fear and loyalty and cultural cohesion.
@fallot EVOLA SAID THE SAME
AGREED @Jake Saga
STRONG LEADERSHIP = FEWER RULES = GREATER CLARITY
AND SODOMY
the only real issue I think is
what keeps everyone on message