we tried but the Strong got a taste for that raw Weak ass

as happens.

THEN THEY ARE NOT STRONG

CF NIETZSCHE SLAVES AND MASTERS

THE STRONG DO NOT DESIRE THE WEAK

there is no way of engineering a "system" that will not fail. Why try?

EXACTLY

The point isn't to make a perfect system that doesn't fail, but to make an adaptable system

CUT OUT THE MIDDLEMAN

THAT SYSTEM IS BIOLOGY, @fallot

HAIL THE WEAK

introduced inefficiency

SODOMIZE THE STRONG

OH WAIT

HAIL THE STRONG

SODOMIZE THE WEAK

and sometimes, you have to ditch the system, so whatever

YOU HAVE THOSE TWO OPTIONS

"make an adaptable system" makes me suspicious and crabby.

(1) HAIL THE WEAK, OR

(2) HAIL THE STRONG

@Jake Saga ME TOO

an adaptable system is not complex, it's simple

LIKE ANAL ITCHING

it's barebones

@fallot AGREED ON SIMPLICITY

"make an adaptable system" sounds pozzed. liberal. 😃

there is a lot of nuance and discretion involved

BEST "SYSTEM" = RELY ON HUMAN QUALITY

AGAIN WITH THE QUALITITATIVE

OY McVEIGH

NUANCE IS INHERENT TO LIFE

the state isn't such a bad thing, it's the current bureaucratic/mandarin PC state that makes it all look bad

DISCRETION = RELIANCE ON PEOPLE QUALITY

THE STATE IS ASS

SORRY CANNOT AGREE WITH YOU THERE

THE STATE ALWAYS TENDS TOWARD THIS SINECURE/MANDARIN INSANITY

IT IS THE NATURE OF THE STATE

well that's why you need that "qualitative" element

REPLACE WITH ARISTOCRACY

you put something on top of them