Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 298153895950286849
afaik east asians are
Like what distinguishes us from chimps is in 2%
in the*
that we share most of our DNA with chimps is an "of course" thing
like how*
do monkeys not have the same cells and cellular structure?
they are similar down to organs
obviously the encoders will be the same
He also objects to the out of africa theory
Out of africa is confused
there is out of africa in the strong sense
which is debunked
then there is out of africa in the sense that ancestors of humans developed in africa
What's the strong sense of it?
which seems pretty much indisputable to me
developed in africa -> some got out -> some became neanderthals and denisovans or even others
later more modern ones from africa got out (weak out of africa)
Ah
and fucked neanderthals and devisovans
Debunked how?
i.e. mixed with neanderthals and denisovans
and developed further after that
like aussie abos barely seem the same species don't they
sorry that's an exaggeration
they do if I look at it outside humanity
Why would that be contradictory?
but still, they look pretty different, they are pretty different
They could have gotten out of africa, deviated, then mixed.
Nah
how do you mean
"<fallot> developed in africa -> some got out -> some became neanderthals and denisovans or even others" -> "<fallot> i.e. mixed with neanderthals and denisovans"
It wouldn't make sense why they'd hold off of each other until they've deviated far enough.
er
I don't know what you are referring to
could have gotten out of africa (like neanderthals), deviated (to neanderthals), mixed (with human ancestors who later left africa, and had obviously continued down a different vein from neanderthals, hence imperfect breeding)
consider that the ancestors of these sentinelese must be the same people as the original dravidians in India
SODOMIZE THE STRONG