Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 301338450500517889
They are
they "toe the line" and the response is never censure
it will always be appeasement
all UN and similar estimates are slow and are always downplaying
DPRK has a small stockpile of warheads, and has delivery methods
it's already a thing
they only don't posses long range missiles, which for their most immediate purposes, aren't necessary
define long range
"we will wipe out toky or seoul"
is sloganeering
the real power of nukes is their ability to wipe out entire battle fleets
like, able to reach the united states?
nukes on battle fleets
come on man
how do you think this stuff works
if you've got that kind of intelligence on a whole fleet you can even throw suicide boats at it and do major damage, much less nukes
I'm familiar
I can't even imagine a proper delivery method for such a device
I don't think you can put a nuclear warhead on those russian anti-carrier missiles
and hit a mobile target, about which you may not be sure re: its position
even the biggest, craziest nuke you can imagine, it's just not a feasible strategy
oh, you could use a cruise missile
google tells me China has a viable anti ship ballistic missile
the device detonates under water
or above water level
it does not have to hit the ship
I understand that
theoretically
I don't think you're appreciating the logistics involved nevertheless
it could be dropped by a suicide bomber, who would accept the risk of being eventually intercepted and shot down
who would be basically cruising at top speed before delivery
just theoretically
you would need multiples of those to even have a chance
moving target with radar, ability to intercept, lack of surety about exact position
and likely with air cover
nukes are more significant as a threat to stationary civilian populations than anything else
"if you punch me, I'll burn down your house"
i believe defense in he region is already tight
a triangle of korea, japan and american fleets there are probably active round o clock