Message from @The Enlightened Shepherd

Discord ID: 302101425540825098


2017-04-13 15:18:35 UTC  

IS GERMAN NATURE "FORM AND HIERARCHY"? IT IS MANY THINGS

2017-04-13 15:18:36 UTC  

too reductive

2017-04-13 15:18:38 UTC  

MORE LIKELY

2017-04-13 15:18:45 UTC  

WE SHOULD LOOK AT THE THREE EUROPES

2017-04-13 15:18:57 UTC  

both categories, DNA and culture, are incomplete

2017-04-13 15:18:58 UTC  

@fallot I DO NOT THINK SO; WITHIN THAT THERE IS INDIVIDUAL CHOICE, BUT ONLY W/N SCOPE DEFINED BY DNA

2017-04-13 15:19:04 UTC  

they don't cover the realms of human existence

2017-04-13 15:19:11 UTC  

a combination, ethnoculture, is a workaround

2017-04-13 15:19:39 UTC  

ETHNOCULTURE IS JUST AN "AND" APPLIED

2017-04-13 15:19:44 UTC  

AND MISSES THE ETHNIC ORIGINS OF CULTURE

2017-04-13 15:19:52 UTC  

THE LEFT THINKS CULTURE COMES BEFORE ETHNICITY

2017-04-13 15:19:53 UTC  

culture itself will have a selecting effect

2017-04-13 15:19:56 UTC  

HAIDT SAYS A FEEDBACK LOOP

2017-04-13 15:19:58 UTC  

so there are cultural effects on ethny

2017-04-13 15:20:08 UTC  

I WROTE ABOUT THIS EXTENSIVELY AND SO TO AVOID BORING YOU, WILL NOT REPEAT

2017-04-13 15:21:47 UTC  

@diversity_is_racism This is again, true, but when understood with flexibility and when understood as a larger, general picture

2017-04-13 15:22:14 UTC  

But this is preciselly what lead you to describe Russian society as a "peasant" society, as if peasants were it's essential component !

2017-04-13 15:22:27 UTC  

If we are speaking of strictly types of labor

2017-04-13 15:22:45 UTC  

Then, I pointed out that EVERY society was peasant including European

2017-04-13 15:22:58 UTC  

to whih you replied circularly, "but Europe had form"

2017-04-13 15:23:12 UTC  

Ancient Egyptian society was peasant but that misses the point

2017-04-13 15:23:18 UTC  

The overall amount of phenotypic variation that generic variation can actually account for is very small and almost irrelevant. Linking societies to DNA doesn't fit.

2017-04-13 15:23:59 UTC  

I must say, that while I certainly prefer even that kind of weltanschaaung to what we have today

2017-04-13 15:24:38 UTC  

what are you talking about @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ ?

2017-04-13 15:24:40 UTC  

Germanic Folkish order where everything is subject to the imperative of a massive genetical folkish gene pool

2017-04-13 15:24:44 UTC  

Is deviant

2017-04-13 15:25:22 UTC  

The idea that German society is due to German Dna. (Insert other societies as needed)

2017-04-13 15:25:34 UTC  

And more importantly, Germany, until Hitler, NEVER subscribed to that worldview

2017-04-13 15:25:53 UTC  

yeah, it is deviant

2017-04-13 15:25:59 UTC  

Or otherwise, Bavarian ruling elite would've never existed and German society would be entirely lead by Northerners which was not the case

2017-04-13 15:27:44 UTC  

Pomeranian peasants for example

2017-04-13 15:27:54 UTC  

PEASANT SOCIETY = FORMED OF PEASANTS NEARLY ENTIRELY

2017-04-13 15:27:55 UTC  

Were highly appreciated by German society as hard working people

2017-04-13 15:27:58 UTC  

EUROPE HAD SOCIAL TIERS

2017-04-13 15:28:00 UTC  

But they were still peasants

2017-04-13 15:28:04 UTC  

WHAT IS THE FASCINATION WITH GERMANY?

2017-04-13 15:28:17 UTC  

NO, MANY OF THEM WERE KSHATRIYA OR BRAHMIN

2017-04-13 15:28:24 UTC  

HENCE EUROPE'S SUCCESS OVER RUSSIA

2017-04-13 15:28:31 UTC  

IN ADDITION TO GENETIC FACTORS (MISCEGENATION)

2017-04-13 15:28:43 UTC  

Define Europe's success over Russia

2017-04-13 15:29:14 UTC  

BETTER QUALITY OUTPUT