Message from @The Enlightened Shepherd
Discord ID: 307188592407609344
but take Codreaunu for example
and his followers
They knew they were more pagan than orthodox in some sense
For Codreanu and those similar to him
I think that what is most important is the protection of the spiritual sentiments of the majority, in his chase, majority, "faith of the polis"being Romanian Orthodox Church
Needless to say, serving as a valid spiritual counter-axis to the opposing (in his opinion) currents, those of modernity and Judaism
To him, it was important to cure the nation of it's godlessness, namely it's lack of spiritual
I feel like in some sense, they all knew their feudal intepretation of Christianity was flawed
fascism in any form rejected semitic Christianity outright
its whether they were neopagan or feudal Christian is where the differences lie
but take Maurras for example
Very open about feudal Christianity just being, essentially a noble myth of utility and not take it's esoteric beliefs seriously
also why evola coined 'catholic pagan'
Catholic reaction was the typical example of "I made a terrible mistake" too late reaction to the mess they brought up themselves
However, deep down, I don't think it's purpose was backward at all, but simply reactionary perhaps in face of an overwhelming current
Catholic Church wanted to protect the "universal" which was not mind you cosmopolitan, as Evola correctly understood
so i assume now that the church is currently gasping for air, it doesn't make much sense to ever return to Christianity
as a Fascist
in Catholic doctrine, Universal was comparableto that of Hindu faith, which did not interfere with local differences
Church is finished, it does not exist
Just as in Hindu faith you had for example, a sacred language Sanskrit
so in Catholic faith you had Latin
in some way, Catholicism could be quite racial at times, but not in Chamberlainian-Grantian way, but preciselly in Evola's vision of race
operating word *at times*
Also, Catholicism wanted to protect the priestly caste from profanity, integration, inclusion and relegation to base ideals
However, unlike Hindu caste, it lacked the bloodline succession
Relying instead on recruitment, which necessarily leads to devolvement, and promotion of men of letters, who as a rule drifts towards rhetorical, and hence, towards that which represents involution
Protestant Reformation was, without one signle trace of doubt, a complete upheaval and rebellion of the inferior
Luther was par excellence, that provincial democratic demagogue, and organizer of the public opinion, and of masses
@andy.flynn I'm not sure what you meant by that
"so i assume now that the church is currently gasping for air, it doesn't make much sense to ever return to Christianity"
if such a choice is possible, there would never be a need for Christianity in the first place
the reason to adhere is its truth, "pragmatic religion" is a nonstarter
the real question is who's paying us ?
who's behind us as a movement ?
have we been used all along by illuminati ?
what movement
the movement of esoteric bodybuilders
yes and no
as far as something is good, Satan cannot assail it, where it isn't it can be channeled towards his ends (including the aforementioned good)