and most knew it as well

Clerical fascism = merely a fascism whose leaders are religious

but take Codreaunu for example

and his followers

They knew they were more pagan than orthodox in some sense

For Codreanu and those similar to him

I think that what is most important is the protection of the spiritual sentiments of the majority, in his chase, majority, "faith of the polis"being Romanian Orthodox Church

Needless to say, serving as a valid spiritual counter-axis to the opposing (in his opinion) currents, those of modernity and Judaism

To him, it was important to cure the nation of it's godlessness, namely it's lack of spiritual

I feel like in some sense, they all knew their feudal intepretation of Christianity was flawed

fascism in any form rejected semitic Christianity outright

its whether they were neopagan or feudal Christian is where the differences lie

but take Maurras for example

Very open about feudal Christianity just being, essentially a noble myth of utility and not take it's esoteric beliefs seriously

also why evola coined 'catholic pagan'

Catholic reaction was the typical example of "I made a terrible mistake" too late reaction to the mess they brought up themselves

However, deep down, I don't think it's purpose was backward at all, but simply reactionary perhaps in face of an overwhelming current

Catholic Church wanted to protect the "universal" which was not mind you cosmopolitan, as Evola correctly understood

so i assume now that the church is currently gasping for air, it doesn't make much sense to ever return to Christianity

as a Fascist

in Catholic doctrine, Universal was comparableto that of Hindu faith, which did not interfere with local differences

Church is finished, it does not exist

What we are witnessing now is completely unrelated to the Church I am talking about

Just as in Hindu faith you had for example, a sacred language Sanskrit

so in Catholic faith you had Latin

in some way, Catholicism could be quite racial at times, but not in Chamberlainian-Grantian way, but preciselly in Evola's vision of race

operating word *at times*

Also, Catholicism wanted to protect the priestly caste from profanity, integration, inclusion and relegation to base ideals

However, unlike Hindu caste, it lacked the bloodline succession

Relying instead on recruitment, which necessarily leads to devolvement, and promotion of men of letters, who as a rule drifts towards rhetorical, and hence, towards that which represents involution

Protestant Reformation was, without one signle trace of doubt, a complete upheaval and rebellion of the inferior

Luther was par excellence, that provincial democratic demagogue, and organizer of the public opinion, and of masses

@andy.flynn I'm not sure what you meant by that

"so i assume now that the church is currently gasping for air, it doesn't make much sense to ever return to Christianity"

if such a choice is possible, there would never be a need for Christianity in the first place

the reason to adhere is its truth, "pragmatic religion" is a nonstarter

the real question is who's paying us ?

who's behind us as a movement ?

have we been used all along by illuminati ?

what movement

the movement of esoteric bodybuilders