Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 307125153697890304
I suppose sometimes it's good to talk it out with another? which would be less good than being able to deal with whatever it is within oneself alone. Though, we are only human
Its why you were not simply created flawless
So you can live and choose
No harm in talking. Remember its about intention and action.
If one knows they can't resist a certain thing, it bypasses choice somewhat
Even then, actual physical removal becomes the choice
There is nothing one truly cannot resist but yeah if they think they will be and seek it anyway
So there's still always a choice
Thats right
I'm trying to think of this example from a story
Something to do with an expedition to Rome
Oh well
Gist?
I may remember
Something about one of the warriors voicing that he wouldn't be able to resist the Roman women
So he simply didn't get to go on that expedition
(?)
Nah dont recall
But every little thing has effect on something
Voicing this for example, vs not, but still not going
yeah for sure
Apathy is the antithesis of faith it would seem
Why am I not metal?
question: is Clerical Fascism an oxymoron?
Seems like most "Clerical" Fascists were closer to post-Christian integralists than anything authentically Christian
and most knew it as well
Clerical fascism = merely a fascism whose leaders are religious
but take Codreaunu for example
and his followers
They knew they were more pagan than orthodox in some sense
For Codreanu and those similar to him
I think that what is most important is the protection of the spiritual sentiments of the majority, in his chase, majority, "faith of the polis"being Romanian Orthodox Church
Needless to say, serving as a valid spiritual counter-axis to the opposing (in his opinion) currents, those of modernity and Judaism
To him, it was important to cure the nation of it's godlessness, namely it's lack of spiritual
I feel like in some sense, they all knew their feudal intepretation of Christianity was flawed
fascism in any form rejected semitic Christianity outright
its whether they were neopagan or feudal Christian is where the differences lie
but take Maurras for example
Very open about feudal Christianity just being, essentially a noble myth of utility and not take it's esoteric beliefs seriously